DIGITAL IMAGE COLORIMETRY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EARTHENWARE UNDER DIFFERENT LIGHTING SOURCES

This study investigated the effect of lighting sources on the smartphone colorimetry of 23 ar-chaeological earthenware samples. Comparable RGB and L*a*b* colors were obtained using both fluorescent room lighting and smartphone flashlight in a closed box for most samples, although some showed substantial differences likely due to variations in measurement points. Averaging readings from different areas of each sample could reduce this uncertainty. Using the color values to classify the earthenware, five coarse-paste wares averagely exhibited higher R, G, and L* values than 18 fine-paste wares made of fine-grained clay regardless of the lighting used. The L* is recommended as the parameter of choice, as RGB values substantially varied from one sample to another. In addition to the color parameters, the effect of lighting depends on the samples measured as the variations in average L*a*b* values were smaller for the fine-paste ware.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Conservation Science
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36868/ijcs.2024.04.07
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIGITAL IMAGE COLORIMETRY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EARTHENWARE UNDER DIFFERENT LIGHTING SOURCES

Yaowarat Sirisathitkul, Chitnarong Sirisathitkul, Wannasan Noonsuk, Jantanipa Nuanjan
International Journal of Conservation Science
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
article

DIGITAL IMAGE COLORIMETRY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EARTHENWARE UNDER DIFFERENT LIGHTING SOURCES

Yaowarat Sirisathitkul, Chitnarong Sirisathitkul, Wannasan Noonsuk, Jantanipa Nuanjan
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of lighting sources on the smartphone colorimetry of 23 ar-chaeological earthenware samples. Comparable RGB and L*a*b* colors were obtained using both fluorescent room lighting and smartphone flashlight in a closed box for most samples, although some showed substantial differences likely due to variations in measurement points. Averaging readings from different areas of each sample could reduce this uncertainty. Using the color values to classify the earthenware, five coarse-paste wares averagely exhibited higher R, G, and L* values than 18 fine-paste wares made of fine-grained clay regardless of the lighting used. The L* is recommended as the parameter of choice, as RGB values substantially varied from one sample to another. In addition to the color parameters, the effect of lighting depends on the samples measured as the variations in average L*a*b* values were smaller for the fine-paste ware.

International Journal of Conservation ScienceVol. 15(4)
Walailak University
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.