Does productive agreement morphology increase sensitivity to agreement in a second language?

Adult language learners have variable performance with subject-verb number agreement. But it is unclear whether their performance additionally depends on the availability of agreement morphology in their first language. To address this question, we conducted a self-paced reading task comparing different speaker groups: (a) first vs. second language speakers of German; (b) intermediate-to-advanced German learners whose first language had more or less productive number agreement morphology (Spanish vs. English). Two manipulations were used to diagnose number processing: agreement violations and agreement attraction. Our results showed decreased sensitivity to agreement violations in language learners, irrespective of the morphological productivity of their first language. Meanwhile, differences in attraction effects were inconclusive in all between-group comparisons. We suggest that second language variability with subject-verb agreement is unlikely to result from increased retrieval interference – the effect underlying attraction. Instead, variable performance more likely arises because learners have difficulties in the real-time mapping of inflectional morphemes to syntactic features.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Glossa Psycholinguistics
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5070/g6011.25340
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does productive agreement morphology increase sensitivity to agreement in a second language?

Sol Lago, Kate Stone, Elise Oltrogge
1 citations
Glossa Psycholinguistics
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
article

Does productive agreement morphology increase sensitivity to agreement in a second language?

Sol Lago, Kate Stone, Elise Oltrogge
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Adult language learners have variable performance with subject-verb number agreement. But it is unclear whether their performance additionally depends on the availability of agreement morphology in their first language. To address this question, we conducted a self-paced reading task comparing different speaker groups: (a) first vs. second language speakers of German; (b) intermediate-to-advanced German learners whose first language had more or less productive number agreement morphology (Spanish vs. English). Two manipulations were used to diagnose number processing: agreement violations and agreement attraction. Our results showed decreased sensitivity to agreement violations in language learners, irrespective of the morphological productivity of their first language. Meanwhile, differences in attraction effects were inconclusive in all between-group comparisons. We suggest that second language variability with subject-verb agreement is unlikely to result from increased retrieval interference – the effect underlying attraction. Instead, variable performance more likely arises because learners have difficulties in the real-time mapping of inflectional morphemes to syntactic features.

Glossa PsycholinguisticsVol. 4(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Goethe-Institute United Kingdom (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does productive agreement morphology increase sensitivity to agreement in a second language? — Sol Lago, Kate Stone, et al. · Glossa Psycholinguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS