Liberating Silence: Sociological Explorations

Past sociological scholarship has narrowly considered silence, with a few exceptions. This paper considers neglected aspects of silence in sociology, focusing on its positive, liberating dimensions. After a review of multidisciplinary research on the subject, we theorize silence sociologically, linking “spaciousness” with George Herbert Mead’s concept of a meaningful pause between stimulus and response. We provide a critique of social conditions that stand in the way of a freely chosen and accessible capacity to be silent. We draw in part on our experiential and research knowledge of forms of meditation to illustrate our argument. We discuss increasing silence commodification in global capitalism and introduce the notion of sensory exploitation. Next, we offer a few suggestions for the social design of silence. In the spirit of public sociology, this partial blueprint contributes to a more resilient, sustainable, and inclusive society. The conclusion contemplates several potential critiques of our perspective and articulates a response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanity & Society
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01605976251314428
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Liberating Silence: Sociological Explorations

Natalia Ruiz‐Junco, Stella M. Čapek
1 citations
Humanity & Society
Noise Effects and Management
3.12
article

Liberating Silence: Sociological Explorations

Natalia Ruiz‐Junco, Stella M. Čapek
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Past sociological scholarship has narrowly considered silence, with a few exceptions. This paper considers neglected aspects of silence in sociology, focusing on its positive, liberating dimensions. After a review of multidisciplinary research on the subject, we theorize silence sociologically, linking “spaciousness” with George Herbert Mead’s concept of a meaningful pause between stimulus and response. We provide a critique of social conditions that stand in the way of a freely chosen and accessible capacity to be silent. We draw in part on our experiential and research knowledge of forms of meditation to illustrate our argument. We discuss increasing silence commodification in global capitalism and introduce the notion of sensory exploitation. Next, we offer a few suggestions for the social design of silence. In the spirit of public sociology, this partial blueprint contributes to a more resilient, sustainable, and inclusive society. The conclusion contemplates several potential critiques of our perspective and articulates a response.

Humanity & SocietyVol. 49(2)
Hendrix College (US), Conway School of Landscape Design (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Noise Effects and Management
3.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Liberating Silence: Sociological Explorations — Natalia Ruiz‐Junco, Stella M. Čapek · Humanity & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS