Formative, not extractive: How critically reflexive research makes a difference

What if the most important route for scholarly impact was not what we write , but instead who we are and what we do ? And what if our being and doing are both shaped by our learning and formation as researchers? In this article, I explore how critical researchers, committed to reflexive practice in their work, can have significant scope for personal impact through three routes. The first route is through the work of education, which impacts directly on current and future practitioners. The second route goes by way a transformational approach to the work of reviewing and editing, which has widespread impact on the field. The third route is connected to taking on leadership roles, which allows reflexive researchers to show how their practice can inform and shape leader work in positive ways. Going further, I propose that personally relevant reflexive research provides the best formation for such routes to impact and highlight potential directions for such projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Learning
Published
2025-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076241284351
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Formative, not extractive: How critically reflexive research makes a difference

Paul Hibbert
6 citations
Management Learning
Management and Organizational Studies
16.58
article

Formative, not extractive: How critically reflexive research makes a difference

Paul Hibbert
article en
6 citations

Abstract

What if the most important route for scholarly impact was not what we write , but instead who we are and what we do ? And what if our being and doing are both shaped by our learning and formation as researchers? In this article, I explore how critical researchers, committed to reflexive practice in their work, can have significant scope for personal impact through three routes. The first route is through the work of education, which impacts directly on current and future practitioners. The second route goes by way a transformational approach to the work of reviewing and editing, which has widespread impact on the field. The third route is connected to taking on leadership roles, which allows reflexive researchers to show how their practice can inform and shape leader work in positive ways. Going further, I propose that personally relevant reflexive research provides the best formation for such routes to impact and highlight potential directions for such projects.

Management LearningVol. 56(1)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Management and Organizational Studies
16.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.