P-1591. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Rapid Interpretation of BCID2 Results: A Pre-Validation Study of a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to enhance patient care, but significant questions remain about implementation and safety. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) could leverage AI to assist with prospective audit and feedback (PAF) interventions such as interpretation of blood culture results and rapid optimization of antimicrobials. At our institution, PAF interventions are performed by the ASP as soon as possible when BioFire® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel (BCID2) results are available. However, these interventions are time consuming and often delayed due to limited resources. To address this gap, we developed a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) tool to assist non-infectious disease (ID) providers with interpretation of BCID2 results. Herein, we aim to describe the process of training the GPT and report pilot study results of the tool’s accuracy compared with ASP recommendations. Methods Using OpenAI’s GPT-4.0, our GPT was trained to synthesize patient-specific treatment advice by analyzing BCID2 results and anonymized patient data. Training focused on applying local as well as national evidence-based recommendations for the management of bacteremia, and providing feedback to the GPT when errors were recognized. A scoring rubric was designed to compare GPT treatment recommendations to gold standard ASP recommendations for the management of bacteremia (Figure 1). An independent infectious disease expert reviewer applied the rubric to determine the accuracy of the GPTs recommendations. Results Five cases of bacteremia were retrospectively reviewed. The GPT recommendations were 67% concordant with best practices, compared to 93% for the ASP (Table 1). Conclusion In this pilot study, a GPT was trained to interpret and manage bacteremia and achieved 67% concordance with best practices. Although inferior to ASP recommendations, GPT is a promising AI tool that warrants further investigation to aid in ASP interventions. Our GPT has been retrained based on our findings, and a larger prospective validation study is underway. Disclosures Daniel Tassone, PharmD, BCIDP, Merck: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1758
Primary Topic
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1591. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Rapid Interpretation of BCID2 Results: A Pre-Validation Study of a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)

Matthew M. Hitchcock, J. Ye, Daniel Tassone, L. P. Beales Ian et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
article

P-1591. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Rapid Interpretation of BCID2 Results: A Pre-Validation Study of a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT)

Matthew M. Hitchcock, J. Ye, Daniel Tassone, L. P. Beales Ian, John D Markley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to enhance patient care, but significant questions remain about implementation and safety. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) could leverage AI to assist with prospective audit and feedback (PAF) interventions such as interpretation of blood culture results and rapid optimization of antimicrobials. At our institution, PAF interventions are performed by the ASP as soon as possible when BioFire® Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel (BCID2) results are available. However, these interventions are time consuming and often delayed due to limited resources. To address this gap, we developed a Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) tool to assist non-infectious disease (ID) providers with interpretation of BCID2 results. Herein, we aim to describe the process of training the GPT and report pilot study results of the tool’s accuracy compared with ASP recommendations. Methods Using OpenAI’s GPT-4.0, our GPT was trained to synthesize patient-specific treatment advice by analyzing BCID2 results and anonymized patient data. Training focused on applying local as well as national evidence-based recommendations for the management of bacteremia, and providing feedback to the GPT when errors were recognized. A scoring rubric was designed to compare GPT treatment recommendations to gold standard ASP recommendations for the management of bacteremia (Figure 1). An independent infectious disease expert reviewer applied the rubric to determine the accuracy of the GPTs recommendations. Results Five cases of bacteremia were retrospectively reviewed. The GPT recommendations were 67% concordant with best practices, compared to 93% for the ASP (Table 1). Conclusion In this pilot study, a GPT was trained to interpret and manage bacteremia and achieved 67% concordance with best practices. Although inferior to ASP recommendations, GPT is a promising AI tool that warrants further investigation to aid in ASP interventions. Our GPT has been retrained based on our findings, and a larger prospective validation study is underway. Disclosures Daniel Tassone, PharmD, BCIDP, Merck: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center (US), VA Central California Health Care System (US), Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Oil and Gas Production Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.