A Crossroad Between Reformulating the Power-sharing System and Federalism for Lebanon

Lebanon is suffering from multiple crises, and the lack of reaction on behalf of the authorities demands a serious reflection on whether Lebanon, as a state entity, can or cannot be saved. It is facing the end of the Second Republic or witnessing the birth of a new political order alien to the former. Although the Lebanese speak the same language and share many cultural and social traditions, the weakening of the central government, its inability to resolve many crises, and deep differences over Lebanon’s regional positioning favor the withdrawal of communities and create fertile ground for the resurgence of the federalist debate. The article argues that the most suitable option to overcome the current stalemate relies not on federalism or partition but on modifying the power-sharing system. The persistent issues arising from implementing semi-consociationalism are highlighted to argue that restoring a fully developed consociational system would enable Lebanon to regain its political stability and order, better equipping it to confront future challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Review of the Middle East
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23477989241305446
Primary Topic
Middle East Politics and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Crossroad Between Reformulating the Power-sharing System and Federalism for Lebanon

Francisco Salvador Barroso Cortés, Father Talal Hachem
Contemporary Review of the Middle East
Middle East Politics and Society
article

A Crossroad Between Reformulating the Power-sharing System and Federalism for Lebanon

Francisco Salvador Barroso Cortés, Father Talal Hachem
article en

Abstract

Lebanon is suffering from multiple crises, and the lack of reaction on behalf of the authorities demands a serious reflection on whether Lebanon, as a state entity, can or cannot be saved. It is facing the end of the Second Republic or witnessing the birth of a new political order alien to the former. Although the Lebanese speak the same language and share many cultural and social traditions, the weakening of the central government, its inability to resolve many crises, and deep differences over Lebanon’s regional positioning favor the withdrawal of communities and create fertile ground for the resurgence of the federalist debate. The article argues that the most suitable option to overcome the current stalemate relies not on federalism or partition but on modifying the power-sharing system. The persistent issues arising from implementing semi-consociationalism are highlighted to argue that restoring a fully developed consociational system would enable Lebanon to regain its political stability and order, better equipping it to confront future challenges.

Contemporary Review of the Middle EastVol. 12(1)
Holy Spirit University of Kaslik (LB), Universidad Loyola Andalucía (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Middle East Politics and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Crossroad Between Reformulating the Power-sharing System and Federalism for Lebanon — Francisco Salvador Barroso Cortés, Father Talal Hachem · Contemporary Review of the Middle East (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS