P-825. Short Versus Long Treatment Duration for Streptococcal Bloodstream Infections

Abstract Background The rise in antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial-related harms and emerging data have prompted a shift towards shorter antibiotic durations. However, there is a lack of data to inform durations of therapy for Streptococcal bloodstream infections (BSI). The need for clearer guidance led us to compare outcomes between short and long antibiotic durations for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI with the goal of informing local and national practice. Effects of Long vs. Short Antibiotic Durations Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of unique adult patients admitted to University of Utah from January 1, 2014 to July 15, 2023 with uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI, defined as negative follow-up blood cultures, clinical resolution by day 3, absence of metastatic foci, source control if indicated, and no other complications. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate the average treatment effects (ATE) of in vitro active antibiotics administered for > 10 days (long duration) versus < 10 days (short duration), adjusting for pretreatment variables. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent bacteremia, all-cause mortality, and readmissions at 30 days from end of treatment (EOT). Secondary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and recurrent bacteremia from EOT. Results 209 patients met criteria for inclusion. The median duration in the long and short groups were 15 (IQR, 14-17) and 8 days (IQR, 7-9.75), respectively. In the propensity score weighted analysis (Table 1), the ATE of long versus short duration was not significant on the composite primary outcome (21% vs 22%; OR= 0.81 [95% CI: 0.34 to 1.91], p=0.62) or any secondary outcomes. Conclusion We found no appreciable difference in outcomes between patients treated with >10 days of antibiotics compared to those treated with <10 days for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI. Given low absolute rates of mortality and recurrent bacteremia, paired with no appreciable difference related to treatment duration, it is reasonable to recommend shorter durations. Given limitations of this retrospective analysis, future research is needed to confirm our findings; however, our data could inform antimicrobial stewardship interventions aimed at decreasing treatment durations for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1017
Primary Topic
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-825. Short Versus Long Treatment Duration for Streptococcal Bloodstream Infections

Julie Gray, Emily S Spivak, Ali Earl, Chong Zhang
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
article

P-825. Short Versus Long Treatment Duration for Streptococcal Bloodstream Infections

Julie Gray, Emily S Spivak, Ali Earl, Chong Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The rise in antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial-related harms and emerging data have prompted a shift towards shorter antibiotic durations. However, there is a lack of data to inform durations of therapy for Streptococcal bloodstream infections (BSI). The need for clearer guidance led us to compare outcomes between short and long antibiotic durations for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI with the goal of informing local and national practice. Effects of Long vs. Short Antibiotic Durations Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of unique adult patients admitted to University of Utah from January 1, 2014 to July 15, 2023 with uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI, defined as negative follow-up blood cultures, clinical resolution by day 3, absence of metastatic foci, source control if indicated, and no other complications. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate the average treatment effects (ATE) of in vitro active antibiotics administered for > 10 days (long duration) versus < 10 days (short duration), adjusting for pretreatment variables. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent bacteremia, all-cause mortality, and readmissions at 30 days from end of treatment (EOT). Secondary outcomes were 90-day all-cause mortality and recurrent bacteremia from EOT. Results 209 patients met criteria for inclusion. The median duration in the long and short groups were 15 (IQR, 14-17) and 8 days (IQR, 7-9.75), respectively. In the propensity score weighted analysis (Table 1), the ATE of long versus short duration was not significant on the composite primary outcome (21% vs 22%; OR= 0.81 [95% CI: 0.34 to 1.91], p=0.62) or any secondary outcomes. Conclusion We found no appreciable difference in outcomes between patients treated with >10 days of antibiotics compared to those treated with <10 days for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI. Given low absolute rates of mortality and recurrent bacteremia, paired with no appreciable difference related to treatment duration, it is reasonable to recommend shorter durations. Given limitations of this retrospective analysis, future research is needed to confirm our findings; however, our data could inform antimicrobial stewardship interventions aimed at decreasing treatment durations for uncomplicated Streptococcal BSI. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Yale New Haven Hospital (US), University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.