84. Improving Traditional Registrational Trial Endpoints: Development and Application of a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Endpoint for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

Abstract Background The ideal primary endpoint for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (ABSSSI) trials is unknown and regulatory guidance differs between U.S. and Europe. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is a paradigm for the design, analysis and interpretation of clinical trials that incorporates a benefit-risk evaluation and provides a global assessment of patient experience. Methods Drawing on prior work from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG), a multidisciplinary committee of experts in infectious diseases, clinical trial design, drug regulation, and patient experience adapted a generalized infectious diseases DOOR for ABSSSI trials (Figure 1). We then retrospectively applied this to two previously published, noninferiority, double-blind, randomized, registrational, ABSSSI trials comparing omadacycline to linezolid OASIS-1 and OASIS-2, Figure 2) to demonstrate how DOOR could be applied. We compared the DOOR distribution and probability of having a more desirable outcome between treatment groups and performed DOOR component analyses. Results For both trials, the ABSSSI DOOR demonstrated similar overall clinical outcomes between treatment groups. In OASIS-1, the probability that a participant treated with omadacycline would have a more desirable outcome than a participant treated with linezolid was 50.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.7%−53.8%) (Figure 3). In OASIS-2, the probability that a participant treated with omadacycline would have a more desirable outcome than a participant treated with linezolid was 51.0% (95% CI, 48.1%–53.8%) (Figure 4). Overall, the DOOR components (clinical failure, infectious complications, serious adverse events, and death) were rare, although the DOOR component analysis provided a more in-depth understanding of the potential trade-offs between efficacy and safety when comparing omadacycline to linezolid. Conclusion DOOR can be informative in registrational ABSSSI trials. Using DOOR can provide clinicians with a better understanding of the clinical outcomes of patients with skin infections. Future trials using DOOR prospectively can continue to inform how to best use DOOR in ABSSSI trials. Disclosures Deborah Collyar, B.Sci, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Kinnate Biopharma: Advisor/Consultant Sumathi Nambiar, MD MPH, Johnson and Johnson: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Carol Hill, PhD, Glaxo SmithKline: Retirement Health, Cash Balance Plan|Glaxo SmithKline: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Thomas L. Holland, MD, Karius, Inc: Advisor/Consultant Sarah B. Doernberg, MD, MAS, Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|F2G Limited: Grant/Research Support|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Janssen/J+J: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Shinogi: Grant/Research Support Henry Chambers, MD, Merck: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Moderna: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS, Affinergy: Advisor/Consultant|ArcBio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Armata: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|ContraFect: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm: Advisor/Consultant|Destiny: Advisor/Consultant|EDE: Grant/Research Support|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support|MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|sepsis diagnostics: Patent pending|UptoDate: Royalties|Valanbuio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Valanbuio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Scott R. Evans, PhD, M.S., Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Advantagene: Advisor/Consultant|Akouos: Advisor/Consultant|Apellis: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZenenca: Advisor/Consultant|BARDA: Advisor/Consultant|Breast International Group: Advisor/Consultant|CDC: Grant/Research Support|Clover: Advisor/Consultant|DayOneBio: Advisor/Consultant|Degruyter: Editorial service|Duke University: Advisor/Consultant|Eli Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|FDA: Advisor/Consultant|Frontier Science Foundation: Board Member|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Henry Jackson Foundation: Grant/Research Support|International Drug Development Institute: Advisor/Consultant|Johson & Johnson: Advisor/Consultant|Medtronic: Advisor/Consultant|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Rakuten: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Taylor & Francis: Book royalties|Teva: Advisor/Consultant|University of Penn: Advisor/Consultant|Vir: Advisor/Consultant|Wake Forest University: Advisor/Consultant|Washington University: Advisor/Consultant Helen Boucher, MD, ASM: Honoraria|Elsevier: Honoraria|Sanford Guide: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

84. Improving Traditional Registrational Trial Endpoints: Development and Application of a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Endpoint for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

Sara E. Cosgrove, Lizhao Ge, Carol Hill, Henry F. Chambers et al.
2 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
article

84. Improving Traditional Registrational Trial Endpoints: Development and Application of a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) Endpoint for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

Sara E. Cosgrove, Lizhao Ge, Carol Hill, Henry F. Chambers, Vance G. Fowler, Holly Geres, Thomas L Holland, Toshimitsu Hamasaki, Deborah Collyar, Sumathi Nambiar, Sarah B. Doernberg, Scott Evans, Jessica Howard‐Anderson, Helen W. Boucher
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The ideal primary endpoint for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection (ABSSSI) trials is unknown and regulatory guidance differs between U.S. and Europe. Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is a paradigm for the design, analysis and interpretation of clinical trials that incorporates a benefit-risk evaluation and provides a global assessment of patient experience. Methods Drawing on prior work from the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG), a multidisciplinary committee of experts in infectious diseases, clinical trial design, drug regulation, and patient experience adapted a generalized infectious diseases DOOR for ABSSSI trials (Figure 1). We then retrospectively applied this to two previously published, noninferiority, double-blind, randomized, registrational, ABSSSI trials comparing omadacycline to linezolid OASIS-1 and OASIS-2, Figure 2) to demonstrate how DOOR could be applied. We compared the DOOR distribution and probability of having a more desirable outcome between treatment groups and performed DOOR component analyses. Results For both trials, the ABSSSI DOOR demonstrated similar overall clinical outcomes between treatment groups. In OASIS-1, the probability that a participant treated with omadacycline would have a more desirable outcome than a participant treated with linezolid was 50.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.7%−53.8%) (Figure 3). In OASIS-2, the probability that a participant treated with omadacycline would have a more desirable outcome than a participant treated with linezolid was 51.0% (95% CI, 48.1%–53.8%) (Figure 4). Overall, the DOOR components (clinical failure, infectious complications, serious adverse events, and death) were rare, although the DOOR component analysis provided a more in-depth understanding of the potential trade-offs between efficacy and safety when comparing omadacycline to linezolid. Conclusion DOOR can be informative in registrational ABSSSI trials. Using DOOR can provide clinicians with a better understanding of the clinical outcomes of patients with skin infections. Future trials using DOOR prospectively can continue to inform how to best use DOOR in ABSSSI trials. Disclosures Deborah Collyar, B.Sci, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant|Kinnate Biopharma: Advisor/Consultant Sumathi Nambiar, MD MPH, Johnson and Johnson: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Carol Hill, PhD, Glaxo SmithKline: Retirement Health, Cash Balance Plan|Glaxo SmithKline: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Thomas L. Holland, MD, Karius, Inc: Advisor/Consultant Sarah B. Doernberg, MD, MAS, Basilea Pharmaceutica: Grant/Research Support|F2G Limited: Grant/Research Support|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Biosciences: Grant/Research Support|Janssen/J+J: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron, Inc: Grant/Research Support|Shinogi: Grant/Research Support Henry Chambers, MD, Merck: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Moderna: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Vance G. Fowler, MD, MHS, Affinergy: Advisor/Consultant|ArcBio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Armata: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Grant/Research Support|Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|ContraFect: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Debiopharm: Advisor/Consultant|Destiny: Advisor/Consultant|EDE: Grant/Research Support|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|Genentech: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Karius: Grant/Research Support|MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|sepsis diagnostics: Patent pending|UptoDate: Royalties|Valanbuio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Valanbuio: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Scott R. Evans, PhD, M.S., Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Advantagene: Advisor/Consultant|Akouos: Advisor/Consultant|Apellis: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZenenca: Advisor/Consultant|BARDA: Advisor/Consultant|Breast International Group: Advisor/Consultant|CDC: Grant/Research Support|Clover: Advisor/Consultant|DayOneBio: Advisor/Consultant|Degruyter: Editorial service|Duke University: Advisor/Consultant|Eli Lilly: Advisor/Consultant|FDA: Advisor/Consultant|Frontier Science Foundation: Board Member|Genentech: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Henry Jackson Foundation: Grant/Research Support|International Drug Development Institute: Advisor/Consultant|Johson & Johnson: Advisor/Consultant|Medtronic: Advisor/Consultant|NIH: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Rakuten: Advisor/Consultant|Roche: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Taylor & Francis: Book royalties|Teva: Advisor/Consultant|University of Penn: Advisor/Consultant|Vir: Advisor/Consultant|Wake Forest University: Advisor/Consultant|Washington University: Advisor/Consultant Helen Boucher, MD, ASM: Honoraria|Elsevier: Honoraria|Sanford Guide: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Tufts University (US), Milken Institute (US), Advocates for Youth (US), Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Emory University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), George Washington University (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.