P-1896. Comparing Clinical Diagnoses of Intraamniotic Infections to the Guideline Definitions

Abstract Background Intraamniotic infection (IAI) or chorioamnionitis is an intrapartum clinical diagnosis. Treatment delay for confirmatory test results can lead to maternal and fetal morbidity. The American College of Gynecology (ACOG) defines “suspected IAI” as persistently elevated temperatures plus findings of purulent cervical discharge, maternal leukocytosis, fundal tenderness, and maternal or fetal tachycardia. These variable and relatively complex diagnostic criteria may introduce clinical confusion and lead to overtreatment. We sought to evaluate compliance with ACOG guidelines in our hospital.Table 1:Diagnostic criteria for IAI including categories of maternal fever and clinical findings Methods A retrospective cohort study was planned. Patients with IAI were identified by ICD diagnoses, and screened for appropriateness. Manual chart abstraction was performed to identify diagnostic criteria for IAI per ACOG guidelines. Additionally, culture and pathology results were reviewed when available. Comparisons between groups were made using chi square. Results 301 patients with IAI were identified between Feb 2016 and Oct 2023. Most (n=281, 93.4%) met ACOG diagnostic criteria but 20 (6.6%) did not have documented indications for initiation of treatment. There is no statistical significance between the number of symptoms and fevers (p=0.55) between groups (Table 1). Few (n=59, 19.6%%) patients had cultures collected, and of these 35.5% (n=21) were positive including placenta (n=10, 47.6%) and blood (n=2, 9.5%). There was not a difference in patients with positive cultures compared to patients with negative or no cultures in fevers (p=0.77) or number of suspected IAI signs (p=0.11). Conclusion The diagnostic criteria for IAI should be refined or reevaluated, particularly in light of their complexity in accurately diagnosing IAI. This is especially important in light of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in an effort to improve patient care, as well as an introduction of rapid diagnostics improving earlier identification of organisms in blood cultures which could significantly impact organism identification earlier than traditional microbiology. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2057
Primary Topic
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1896. Comparing Clinical Diagnoses of Intraamniotic Infections to the Guideline Definitions

Michaël Thomas, Jennifer Palomo, Amy Crockett, Sarah Withers et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
article

P-1896. Comparing Clinical Diagnoses of Intraamniotic Infections to the Guideline Definitions

Michaël Thomas, Jennifer Palomo, Amy Crockett, Sarah Withers, Pamela Bailey, Grace Pazienza, Sean Stuart, Lance Schacht
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Intraamniotic infection (IAI) or chorioamnionitis is an intrapartum clinical diagnosis. Treatment delay for confirmatory test results can lead to maternal and fetal morbidity. The American College of Gynecology (ACOG) defines “suspected IAI” as persistently elevated temperatures plus findings of purulent cervical discharge, maternal leukocytosis, fundal tenderness, and maternal or fetal tachycardia. These variable and relatively complex diagnostic criteria may introduce clinical confusion and lead to overtreatment. We sought to evaluate compliance with ACOG guidelines in our hospital.Table 1:Diagnostic criteria for IAI including categories of maternal fever and clinical findings Methods A retrospective cohort study was planned. Patients with IAI were identified by ICD diagnoses, and screened for appropriateness. Manual chart abstraction was performed to identify diagnostic criteria for IAI per ACOG guidelines. Additionally, culture and pathology results were reviewed when available. Comparisons between groups were made using chi square. Results 301 patients with IAI were identified between Feb 2016 and Oct 2023. Most (n=281, 93.4%) met ACOG diagnostic criteria but 20 (6.6%) did not have documented indications for initiation of treatment. There is no statistical significance between the number of symptoms and fevers (p=0.55) between groups (Table 1). Few (n=59, 19.6%%) patients had cultures collected, and of these 35.5% (n=21) were positive including placenta (n=10, 47.6%) and blood (n=2, 9.5%). There was not a difference in patients with positive cultures compared to patients with negative or no cultures in fevers (p=0.77) or number of suspected IAI signs (p=0.11). Conclusion The diagnostic criteria for IAI should be refined or reevaluated, particularly in light of their complexity in accurately diagnosing IAI. This is especially important in light of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in an effort to improve patient care, as well as an introduction of rapid diagnostics improving earlier identification of organisms in blood cultures which could significantly impact organism identification earlier than traditional microbiology. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Prisma Health (US), University of South Carolina (US), Palmetto Health Richland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.