P-386. Assessing Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections Through a Statewide Survey of Nebraska Hospitals

Abstract Background Almost half of surgical site infections (SSIs) are preventable by application of evidence-based strategies. An online survey of Nebraska hospitals was conducted by the Nebraska Healthcare-Associated Infections/Antimicrobial Resistance Advisory Council’s SSI Subcommittee between March and May 2023 to assess implementation of evidence-based practice recommendations (EBPR) from national guidelines. Methods Infection preventionists completed the survey in collaboration with their perioperative teams. In addition to facility demographics, data was collected on general SSI prevention practices along with those specific to colon procedures, hysterectomies, and cesarean sections. Implementation frequencies were calculated for each EBPR after excluding missing responses.Figure 2:Routine Audits Conducted by Facilities Results Response rates for acute care and critical access hospitals were 72% (21/29) and 47% (30/64), respectively. Most EBPR (19/30) assessed were reported to be implemented by majority ( >50%) of the hospitals. The least implemented EBPR was vaginal cleansing prior to all cesarean sections (16%, 5/31) (Figure 1). Audits to monitor operating room traffic and skin antisepsis were conducted by approximately a third of hospitals (31%, 15/49 and 33%, 16/48, respectively) (Figure 2). Among hospitals that performed hysterectomies (n=23), less than half reported performing vaginal cleansing prior to all hysterectomies (43%), presence of policies/protocols for pre- and intraoperative antibiotic use for hysterectomies (39%) and monitoring of antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for hysterectomies (43%). Least implemented colon procedure specific EBPR in hospitals performing these procedures (n=26) included having standardized policies/procedures for mechanical bowel preparation (35%), presence of policies/protocols for pre- and intraoperative antibiotic use for colon procedures (50%,) and monitoring of antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for colon procedures (54%). Conclusion Several EBPR for SSI prevention are not routinely implemented highlighting the need for educational efforts to raise awareness among hospitals. Future studies should focus on identifying practice barriers and mitigation strategies to increase implementation. Disclosures Trevor C. Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FIDSA, AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|BioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|BioMerieux: Honoraria|Thermo-Fisher: Honoraria Renuga Vivekanandan, MD, MDconsult: Ownership Interest Muhammad Salman Ashraf, MBBS, Merck & Co. Inc: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.587
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-386. Assessing Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections Through a Statewide Survey of Nebraska Hospitals

Jody Scebold, Renuga Vivekanandan, Muhammad Salman Ashraf, Trevor Van Schooneveld et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Surgical site infection prevention
article

P-386. Assessing Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice Recommendations for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections Through a Statewide Survey of Nebraska Hospitals

Jody Scebold, Renuga Vivekanandan, Muhammad Salman Ashraf, Trevor Van Schooneveld, Mark Baker, Emily Nelson, Lev Pavlovsky, Rebecca Penn, FNU Kanishka, Kate Tyner, Jenna Preusker, Rebecca Martinez, Mary W Kinyoun, T. Patrick Hill, Angel Plueger, Laura A Hoogestraat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Almost half of surgical site infections (SSIs) are preventable by application of evidence-based strategies. An online survey of Nebraska hospitals was conducted by the Nebraska Healthcare-Associated Infections/Antimicrobial Resistance Advisory Council’s SSI Subcommittee between March and May 2023 to assess implementation of evidence-based practice recommendations (EBPR) from national guidelines. Methods Infection preventionists completed the survey in collaboration with their perioperative teams. In addition to facility demographics, data was collected on general SSI prevention practices along with those specific to colon procedures, hysterectomies, and cesarean sections. Implementation frequencies were calculated for each EBPR after excluding missing responses.Figure 2:Routine Audits Conducted by Facilities Results Response rates for acute care and critical access hospitals were 72% (21/29) and 47% (30/64), respectively. Most EBPR (19/30) assessed were reported to be implemented by majority ( >50%) of the hospitals. The least implemented EBPR was vaginal cleansing prior to all cesarean sections (16%, 5/31) (Figure 1). Audits to monitor operating room traffic and skin antisepsis were conducted by approximately a third of hospitals (31%, 15/49 and 33%, 16/48, respectively) (Figure 2). Among hospitals that performed hysterectomies (n=23), less than half reported performing vaginal cleansing prior to all hysterectomies (43%), presence of policies/protocols for pre- and intraoperative antibiotic use for hysterectomies (39%) and monitoring of antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for hysterectomies (43%). Least implemented colon procedure specific EBPR in hospitals performing these procedures (n=26) included having standardized policies/procedures for mechanical bowel preparation (35%), presence of policies/protocols for pre- and intraoperative antibiotic use for colon procedures (50%,) and monitoring of antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for colon procedures (54%). Conclusion Several EBPR for SSI prevention are not routinely implemented highlighting the need for educational efforts to raise awareness among hospitals. Future studies should focus on identifying practice barriers and mitigation strategies to increase implementation. Disclosures Trevor C. Van Schooneveld, MD, FSHEA, FIDSA, AN2 Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|BioMerieux: Grant/Research Support|BioMerieux: Honoraria|Thermo-Fisher: Honoraria Renuga Vivekanandan, MD, MDconsult: Ownership Interest Muhammad Salman Ashraf, MBBS, Merck & Co. Inc: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Nebraska Medical Center (US), Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (US), CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center - Bergan Mercy (US), Nebraska Methodist College (US), CHI Health (US), Women's Hospital (US), Faith Regional Health Services (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.