P-1478. Assessment of Beta-lactam Susceptibility Profiles in <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>: A Comprehensive Analysis at an Academic Medical Center

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most difficult bacterial pathogens to treat. As beta-lactams remain the most prescribed class of antimicrobials to treat P. aeruginosa infections, the objective of this study was to describe susceptibility profiles of first line beta-lactam antimicrobials against P. aeruginosa at our academic medical center. Methods All non-duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates from 2021-2023 were analyzed. First line beta-lactams evaluated included aztreonam (AZT), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (CFP), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), meropenem (MEM) as well as newer beta-lactams ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), and ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A). Susceptibility testing was performed with the BD Phoenix™ automated system or E-test. Data obtained for each patient included culture date, source of infection, hospital location, and MIC. Each MIC was categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant based on 2024 CLSI MIC breakpoints. Results Overall susceptibility rates for each beta-lactam for 1177 isolates were as follows: AZT (75%), CAZ (82%), CFP (83%), PTZ (79%), MEM (84%), C/T (99%), and C/A (99%). Moreover, 70% of P. aeruginosa strains were susceptible to all first line beta-lactams tested, while 25% displayed non-susceptibility to at least 1 first line beta-lactam, and 5% exhibited non-susceptibility to all first line beta-lactams tested. Among strains non-susceptible to at least 1 first line beta-lactam, the majority (37%) exhibited non-susceptibility to only 1 beta-lactam, while 20% and 19% displayed non-susceptibility to 2 or 3 beta-lactams, respectively. Additionally, 25% demonstrated non-susceptibility to 4 beta-lactams. Finally, respiratory isolates consistently displayed the highest incidence of non-susceptibility for each beta-lactam compared to blood, urine, wound, and miscellaneous body sites. Conclusion This study highlights the variable susceptibility of first-line beta-lactam antimicrobials against P. aeruginosa infections. These findings stress the importance of customized treatment strategies, surveillance for evolving resistance, and considering newer beta-lactams such as ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, alongside prudent antibiotic utilization in clinical practice. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1648
Primary Topic
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1478. Assessment of Beta-lactam Susceptibility Profiles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Comprehensive Analysis at an Academic Medical Center

Katie B. Olney, David S. Burgess, Donna R. Burgess
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
article

P-1478. Assessment of Beta-lactam Susceptibility Profiles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Comprehensive Analysis at an Academic Medical Center

Katie B. Olney, David S. Burgess, Donna R. Burgess
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most difficult bacterial pathogens to treat. As beta-lactams remain the most prescribed class of antimicrobials to treat P. aeruginosa infections, the objective of this study was to describe susceptibility profiles of first line beta-lactam antimicrobials against P. aeruginosa at our academic medical center. Methods All non-duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates from 2021-2023 were analyzed. First line beta-lactams evaluated included aztreonam (AZT), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (CFP), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ), meropenem (MEM) as well as newer beta-lactams ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), and ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A). Susceptibility testing was performed with the BD Phoenix™ automated system or E-test. Data obtained for each patient included culture date, source of infection, hospital location, and MIC. Each MIC was categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant based on 2024 CLSI MIC breakpoints. Results Overall susceptibility rates for each beta-lactam for 1177 isolates were as follows: AZT (75%), CAZ (82%), CFP (83%), PTZ (79%), MEM (84%), C/T (99%), and C/A (99%). Moreover, 70% of P. aeruginosa strains were susceptible to all first line beta-lactams tested, while 25% displayed non-susceptibility to at least 1 first line beta-lactam, and 5% exhibited non-susceptibility to all first line beta-lactams tested. Among strains non-susceptible to at least 1 first line beta-lactam, the majority (37%) exhibited non-susceptibility to only 1 beta-lactam, while 20% and 19% displayed non-susceptibility to 2 or 3 beta-lactams, respectively. Additionally, 25% demonstrated non-susceptibility to 4 beta-lactams. Finally, respiratory isolates consistently displayed the highest incidence of non-susceptibility for each beta-lactam compared to blood, urine, wound, and miscellaneous body sites. Conclusion This study highlights the variable susceptibility of first-line beta-lactam antimicrobials against P. aeruginosa infections. These findings stress the importance of customized treatment strategies, surveillance for evolving resistance, and considering newer beta-lactams such as ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, alongside prudent antibiotic utilization in clinical practice. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Kentucky HealthCare (US), University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.