P-1628. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® BCID2 Panel and Antimicrobial Stewardship on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteremia

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections (BSIs) carry high rates of morbidity and mortality, with delays in appropriate therapy associated with worse outcomes. Given limited available literature, our objective was to describe the impact of BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel implementation on clinical outcomes in patients with organisms not covered by empiric regimens. Methods This was a retrospective review comparing adults with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), carbapenemase (CRE), or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, or Enterococcus species BSIs pre- (7/2020–12/2021) and post- (7/2022–12/2023) BCID2 implementation. Patients were excluded if the initial positive blood culture (BCX) was from an outside facility, had organisms not on the BCID2 panel, or if they died or were discharged prior to BCX results. The primary outcome was time from BCX positivity to initiation of effective therapy. Process measures included pharmacist interventions. Clinical outcomes included recurrence, resistance development, readmission, Clostridioides difficile infection, and mortality. Results 319 patients were included (pre-BCID2 n=128; post-BCID2 n=191), with a median age of 69 years (57-81). The most common infecting organisms were Enterococcus spp. (44%) and ESBL Enterobacterales (41%), and the majority were from urinary (35%) or intra-abdominal (28%) sources. Time to effective therapy was significantly shorter post-BCID2 (7 v. 4 hours, p=0.011), particularly among those with ESBL (40 v. 5 hours, p< 0.001), high-risk AmpC-producing organism (41 v. 6 hours, p=0.174), and E. faecium infections (17 v. 5 hours, p=0.067). Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists performed more interventions post-BCID2 (34% v. 49%, p=0.006) with a higher number of interventions performed pre-MALDI-TOF speciation (22% v. 39%, p=0.002). Given low event rates, we were unable to demonstrate clinically meaningful differences in secondary endpoints between groups.Figure 1.Primary Outcome: Time to Effective Therapy Conclusion Implementation of BCID2 in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship was associated with shorter time to effective therapy. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of this on patient-related outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1794
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1628. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® BCID2 Panel and Antimicrobial Stewardship on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteremia

Ioannis M. Zacharioudakis, Kassandra Marsh, Dana Mazo, Arnold Decano et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1628. Impact of the BioFire® FilmArray® BCID2 Panel and Antimicrobial Stewardship on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteremia

Ioannis M. Zacharioudakis, Kassandra Marsh, Dana Mazo, Arnold Decano, Yihan Li, Yanina Dubrovskaya, Justin Siegfried
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections (BSIs) carry high rates of morbidity and mortality, with delays in appropriate therapy associated with worse outcomes. Given limited available literature, our objective was to describe the impact of BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification 2 (BCID2) panel implementation on clinical outcomes in patients with organisms not covered by empiric regimens. Methods This was a retrospective review comparing adults with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), carbapenemase (CRE), or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, or Enterococcus species BSIs pre- (7/2020–12/2021) and post- (7/2022–12/2023) BCID2 implementation. Patients were excluded if the initial positive blood culture (BCX) was from an outside facility, had organisms not on the BCID2 panel, or if they died or were discharged prior to BCX results. The primary outcome was time from BCX positivity to initiation of effective therapy. Process measures included pharmacist interventions. Clinical outcomes included recurrence, resistance development, readmission, Clostridioides difficile infection, and mortality. Results 319 patients were included (pre-BCID2 n=128; post-BCID2 n=191), with a median age of 69 years (57-81). The most common infecting organisms were Enterococcus spp. (44%) and ESBL Enterobacterales (41%), and the majority were from urinary (35%) or intra-abdominal (28%) sources. Time to effective therapy was significantly shorter post-BCID2 (7 v. 4 hours, p=0.011), particularly among those with ESBL (40 v. 5 hours, p< 0.001), high-risk AmpC-producing organism (41 v. 6 hours, p=0.174), and E. faecium infections (17 v. 5 hours, p=0.067). Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists performed more interventions post-BCID2 (34% v. 49%, p=0.006) with a higher number of interventions performed pre-MALDI-TOF speciation (22% v. 39%, p=0.002). Given low event rates, we were unable to demonstrate clinically meaningful differences in secondary endpoints between groups.Figure 1.Primary Outcome: Time to Effective Therapy Conclusion Implementation of BCID2 in conjunction with antimicrobial stewardship was associated with shorter time to effective therapy. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of this on patient-related outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
NYU Langone Health (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.