P-566. Long-term virologic outcomes of oral two-drug vs three-drug antiretroviral regimens in children, adolescents and adults living with HIV

Abstract Background Despite the availability and efficacy of two-drug regimens (2DR) for HIV treatment, three-drug regimens (3DR) are mostly used by people with HIV (PWH). We evaluated virologic outcomes of initiating or switching to a 2DR vs 3DR among PWH in Washington, DC. Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Model for Virologic Non-Suppression (viral load > 200 copies/mL) among PWH by Two- and Three-Drug Regimens in the DC Cohort, 2019-2023 Methods We included DC Cohort treatment-experienced participants initiating or switching to a 2DR or 3DR on or after July 2019 with ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics for demographic and clinical factors at regimen initiation, including HIV viral load (VL) and CD4 count (cells/µL), were stratified by 2DR or 3DR. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed among participants virally suppressed (VS; VL< 200 copies/mL) at regimen initiation to assess the time to non-virologic suppression (non-VS) using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CI adjusting for demographics, HIV risk, and regimen. Among participants who were not VS at the time of regimen initiation, we conducted a sub-analysis of the time to VS. Results We analyzed 1782 participants (72.8% 3DR, 28.2% 2DR (161 switched from a 3DR); age 54.3 years (IQR 43.8-61.3), 68.8% male; 78.1% Black) with a median CD4 621 (IQR 409-868) at regimen initiation. Participants on 2DR were older (56.4 vs 53.6 years; p< 0.001) and had higher VS rates (93.8% vs 88.2%; p< 0.001) at regimen initiation and shorter regimen times (3.2 vs 3.8 years; p< 0.001) compared to 3DR. 2DR participants were more likely to have public vs private insurance and receive hospital vs community-based care. The risk of non-VS was higher among those with CD4 < 200 and 200-500 (aHR 1.5(1.0-2.1) and aHR 2.0(1.1-3.6), respectively) compared to those with CD4 >500. Those with public insurance were also more likely to experience non-VS (aHR 1.5; p< 0.05). While regimen type was not a significant predictor of non-VS, there was an elevated risk among those on 3DR (aHR 1.2) compared to 2DR [Figure]. Among those non-VS at regimen initiation (n=146), the median time to VS was similar among PWH on 2DR (14.1 months) and 3DR (13.8 months; p=0.76). Conclusion Non-VS PWH have similar time to VS regardless of whether they receive 2DR or 3DR, suggesting similar efficacy of 2DR and 3DR in these populations. Patients with CD4 < 500 had higher risk of non-VS on 2DR, supporting the usefulness of the CD4 criteria factor when selecting 2DR vs 3DR. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.764
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-566. Long-term virologic outcomes of oral two-drug vs three-drug antiretroviral regimens in children, adolescents and adults living with HIV

Morgan Byrne, Anne K. Monroe, Wei Li Adeline Koay, Lauren O’Connor et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
article

P-566. Long-term virologic outcomes of oral two-drug vs three-drug antiretroviral regimens in children, adolescents and adults living with HIV

Morgan Byrne, Anne K. Monroe, Wei Li Adeline Koay, Lauren O’Connor, Rachel Denyer, Amanda D. Castel, Natella Rakhmanina, Justin Unternaher
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite the availability and efficacy of two-drug regimens (2DR) for HIV treatment, three-drug regimens (3DR) are mostly used by people with HIV (PWH). We evaluated virologic outcomes of initiating or switching to a 2DR vs 3DR among PWH in Washington, DC. Adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Model for Virologic Non-Suppression (viral load > 200 copies/mL) among PWH by Two- and Three-Drug Regimens in the DC Cohort, 2019-2023 Methods We included DC Cohort treatment-experienced participants initiating or switching to a 2DR or 3DR on or after July 2019 with ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics for demographic and clinical factors at regimen initiation, including HIV viral load (VL) and CD4 count (cells/µL), were stratified by 2DR or 3DR. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed among participants virally suppressed (VS; VL< 200 copies/mL) at regimen initiation to assess the time to non-virologic suppression (non-VS) using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CI adjusting for demographics, HIV risk, and regimen. Among participants who were not VS at the time of regimen initiation, we conducted a sub-analysis of the time to VS. Results We analyzed 1782 participants (72.8% 3DR, 28.2% 2DR (161 switched from a 3DR); age 54.3 years (IQR 43.8-61.3), 68.8% male; 78.1% Black) with a median CD4 621 (IQR 409-868) at regimen initiation. Participants on 2DR were older (56.4 vs 53.6 years; p< 0.001) and had higher VS rates (93.8% vs 88.2%; p< 0.001) at regimen initiation and shorter regimen times (3.2 vs 3.8 years; p< 0.001) compared to 3DR. 2DR participants were more likely to have public vs private insurance and receive hospital vs community-based care. The risk of non-VS was higher among those with CD4 < 200 and 200-500 (aHR 1.5(1.0-2.1) and aHR 2.0(1.1-3.6), respectively) compared to those with CD4 >500. Those with public insurance were also more likely to experience non-VS (aHR 1.5; p< 0.05). While regimen type was not a significant predictor of non-VS, there was an elevated risk among those on 3DR (aHR 1.2) compared to 2DR [Figure]. Among those non-VS at regimen initiation (n=146), the median time to VS was similar among PWH on 2DR (14.1 months) and 3DR (13.8 months; p=0.76). Conclusion Non-VS PWH have similar time to VS regardless of whether they receive 2DR or 3DR, suggesting similar efficacy of 2DR and 3DR in these populations. Patients with CD4 < 500 had higher risk of non-VS on 2DR, supporting the usefulness of the CD4 criteria factor when selecting 2DR vs 3DR. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Milken Institute (US), Children's National (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), George Washington University (US), Washington DC VA Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.