P-1383. Gap in Doxy PEP Prescription for People Living With HIV Compared with PrEP Users in a Primary Care Practice

Abstract Background Use of 200mg of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis within 72 hours of a condomless sexual encounter (Doxy PEP) has been shown to reduce the risk of key sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Doxy PEP is effective both for people living with HIV (PLH) as well as those who do not have HIV. The goal of this analysis was to describe uptake of Doxy PEP in a primary care practice in Syracuse, NY, a Northeastern U.S. city serving a large population of PLH as well as people prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Methods Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Patients who were seen for HIV or PrEP care between 1 Jan and 31 December, 2023 who were transgender women (TGW) or cisgender men self-identified as gay, bisexual, or “other” sexual orientation (MSM) and had been diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis during 2023 were analyzed. Doxy PEP discussion and prescription were determined through medication review and office notes up through the first quarter of 2024. Factors associated with providers recommending and/or prescribing doxy PEP were evaluated using bivariable and multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 602 MSM and 25 TGW were seen in the practice during 2023; 117 (18.7%) were diagnosed with at least one STI, specifically syphilis [37; (31.6%)], chlamydia [33 (28.2%)], gonorrhea [23 (19.7%)] or more than 1 of these [24 (20.5%)]. A total of 46 (39.3%) patients were prescribed doxy PEP; 11 (9.3%) declined, and 60 (51.3%) had no documented discussion or prescription. Most 35 (76.1%) prescriptions were in the 1st quarter of 2024; average days between STI diagnosis and doxy PEP prescription was 200 days. On multivariate analysis (MVA), only PrEP vs. HIV was associated with prescription (OR 13.3 p< 0.0001; this held even after excluding 4th quarter STI diagnoses to account for less frequent follow up of PLH vs. PrEP users (OR 17.5, p=0.001). Doxy PEP prescription was not associated with age, race or ethnicity, type or site of STI, provider, or time (days) since STI diagnosis. Conclusion Doxy PEP is a valuable tool for reducing STIs; it may be underutilized in people living with HIV despite ongoing risk, and methods to encourage prescription for PLH are warranted. Disclosures Elizabeth Asiago-Reddy, MD, Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|GSK/Viiv: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies, Inc.: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1559
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1383. Gap in Doxy PEP Prescription for People Living With HIV Compared with PrEP Users in a Primary Care Practice

Courtney Myers, Elizabeth Asiago‐Reddy, Nabeil Himat
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

P-1383. Gap in Doxy PEP Prescription for People Living With HIV Compared with PrEP Users in a Primary Care Practice

Courtney Myers, Elizabeth Asiago‐Reddy, Nabeil Himat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Use of 200mg of doxycycline as post-exposure prophylaxis within 72 hours of a condomless sexual encounter (Doxy PEP) has been shown to reduce the risk of key sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Doxy PEP is effective both for people living with HIV (PLH) as well as those who do not have HIV. The goal of this analysis was to describe uptake of Doxy PEP in a primary care practice in Syracuse, NY, a Northeastern U.S. city serving a large population of PLH as well as people prescribed pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Methods Data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Patients who were seen for HIV or PrEP care between 1 Jan and 31 December, 2023 who were transgender women (TGW) or cisgender men self-identified as gay, bisexual, or “other” sexual orientation (MSM) and had been diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis during 2023 were analyzed. Doxy PEP discussion and prescription were determined through medication review and office notes up through the first quarter of 2024. Factors associated with providers recommending and/or prescribing doxy PEP were evaluated using bivariable and multivariate logistic regression. Results A total of 602 MSM and 25 TGW were seen in the practice during 2023; 117 (18.7%) were diagnosed with at least one STI, specifically syphilis [37; (31.6%)], chlamydia [33 (28.2%)], gonorrhea [23 (19.7%)] or more than 1 of these [24 (20.5%)]. A total of 46 (39.3%) patients were prescribed doxy PEP; 11 (9.3%) declined, and 60 (51.3%) had no documented discussion or prescription. Most 35 (76.1%) prescriptions were in the 1st quarter of 2024; average days between STI diagnosis and doxy PEP prescription was 200 days. On multivariate analysis (MVA), only PrEP vs. HIV was associated with prescription (OR 13.3 p< 0.0001; this held even after excluding 4th quarter STI diagnoses to account for less frequent follow up of PLH vs. PrEP users (OR 17.5, p=0.001). Doxy PEP prescription was not associated with age, race or ethnicity, type or site of STI, provider, or time (days) since STI diagnosis. Conclusion Doxy PEP is a valuable tool for reducing STIs; it may be underutilized in people living with HIV despite ongoing risk, and methods to encourage prescription for PLH are warranted. Disclosures Elizabeth Asiago-Reddy, MD, Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|GSK/Viiv: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Theratechnologies, Inc.: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.