P-2100. Comparison of Fosfomycin MIC Values between Parent and Inner Colonies (IC) of <i>Escherichia coli</i> Arising During Disk Diffusion (DD) Testing

Abstract Background Recent studies have documented uropathogenic E. coli displaying the presence of IC during fosfomycin DD testing. These IC often demonstrate increased minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) when compared to their parent isolates. Investigating the clinical relevance of these IC and the extent of their resistance is a first step in determining whether they are associated with fosfomycin failure. Methods E. coli isolates (n = 69) collected from the University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC) that produced ≥ 3 discrete IC during at least one DD test were included. Parent and IC (n = 69) isolates underwent broth microdilution (BMD) testing using fosfomycin concentrations of 0.5-64 µg/mL for parent isolates and 8-1024 µg/mL for IC with incubation at 37°C for 16-20 hours. All susceptibility testing was supplemented with 25 µg/mL glucose-6-phosphate and conducted in duplicate on separate days. E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were included as quality control strains. The results were evaluated using both CLSI (susceptible [S]: 64 µg/mL) and EUCAST (S: 8 µg/mL) breakpoints. Categorical agreement between the two guidelines were calculated. Results E. coli parent isolates had an MIC range of 1 to &amp;gt;64 µg/mL with a MIC50/90 of 8/32 µg/mL (Table 1). The IC isolates had significantly higher MIC ranges (&amp;lt; 8 and &amp;gt;1024 µg/mL) and MIC50/90 values of 256/ &amp;gt;1024 µg/mL. The parent isolates had 94.2% (n = 65) and 69.6% (n = 48) susceptibility per CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. Using the more stringent EUCAST breakpoints, all IC isolates were resistant whereas 65.2% (n = 45) were considered resistant per CLSI breakpoints. Categorical agreement among the parent collection was 75.4% and 65.2% in the IC collection (Table 2). Conclusion Our data indicate IC arising from E. coli during fosfomycin DD testing are notably more resistant than their parent isolates, with an MIC50 increase of five, 2-fold dilutions. Future directions for this work include expanding the isolate collection and examining the fitness of these IC in comparison to their parents. Improving the understanding of the frequency, resistance, and fitness of IC arising from fosfomycin DD testing will help determine an optimal interpretation of IC, which may in turn improve patient outcomes. Disclosures Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2256
Primary Topic
Urinary Tract Infections Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2100. Comparison of Fosfomycin MIC Values between Parent and Inner Colonies (IC) of Escherichia coli Arising During Disk Diffusion (DD) Testing

Morgan L Bixby, Jenna Salay, Lindsey Collins, Elizabeth B. Hirsch et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Urinary Tract Infections Management
article

P-2100. Comparison of Fosfomycin MIC Values between Parent and Inner Colonies (IC) of Escherichia coli Arising During Disk Diffusion (DD) Testing

Morgan L Bixby, Jenna Salay, Lindsey Collins, Elizabeth B. Hirsch, Tsung Chain Chang, K. A. Malik
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent studies have documented uropathogenic E. coli displaying the presence of IC during fosfomycin DD testing. These IC often demonstrate increased minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) when compared to their parent isolates. Investigating the clinical relevance of these IC and the extent of their resistance is a first step in determining whether they are associated with fosfomycin failure. Methods E. coli isolates (n = 69) collected from the University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC) that produced ≥ 3 discrete IC during at least one DD test were included. Parent and IC (n = 69) isolates underwent broth microdilution (BMD) testing using fosfomycin concentrations of 0.5-64 µg/mL for parent isolates and 8-1024 µg/mL for IC with incubation at 37°C for 16-20 hours. All susceptibility testing was supplemented with 25 µg/mL glucose-6-phosphate and conducted in duplicate on separate days. E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. coli ATCC 25922 were included as quality control strains. The results were evaluated using both CLSI (susceptible [S]: 64 µg/mL) and EUCAST (S: 8 µg/mL) breakpoints. Categorical agreement between the two guidelines were calculated. Results E. coli parent isolates had an MIC range of 1 to &amp;gt;64 µg/mL with a MIC50/90 of 8/32 µg/mL (Table 1). The IC isolates had significantly higher MIC ranges (&amp;lt; 8 and &amp;gt;1024 µg/mL) and MIC50/90 values of 256/ &amp;gt;1024 µg/mL. The parent isolates had 94.2% (n = 65) and 69.6% (n = 48) susceptibility per CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. Using the more stringent EUCAST breakpoints, all IC isolates were resistant whereas 65.2% (n = 45) were considered resistant per CLSI breakpoints. Categorical agreement among the parent collection was 75.4% and 65.2% in the IC collection (Table 2). Conclusion Our data indicate IC arising from E. coli during fosfomycin DD testing are notably more resistant than their parent isolates, with an MIC50 increase of five, 2-fold dilutions. Future directions for this work include expanding the isolate collection and examining the fitness of these IC in comparison to their parents. Improving the understanding of the frequency, resistance, and fitness of IC arising from fosfomycin DD testing will help determine an optimal interpretation of IC, which may in turn improve patient outcomes. Disclosures Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Minnesota (US), Twin Cities Orthopedics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Urinary Tract Infections Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.