P-2098. Clinical culture rates among hospitalized patients in the United States, 2012-2021

Abstract Background Microbial cultures are used in clinical care and to track trends in infectious diseases. Changes in culturing practices may affect these trends but have not been thoroughly explored. This analysis examines temporal and facility variability of clinical cultures among a cohort of acute care hospitals in the U.S. from 2012-2021. Methods We used microbiology data from a dynamic cohort of hospitals reporting data to the PINC-AI Healthcare Database from 2012-2021. Surveillance cultures and hospitals with outlier hospital-months were excluded. We defined admission cultures as those collected on or before calendar day 3 of hospitalization and post-admission cultures as those collected after calendar day 3. Admission culture rates were calculated per 1,000 discharges. Post-admission culture rates were calculated per 1,000 patient days. We calculated overall rates as well as rates stratified by specimen source (blood, respiratory, urine, other sterile sites, and other non-sterile sites). To account for multiple blood culture sets, only the first blood culture per patient per day was counted in this analysis. Results From 2012-2021, 361 hospitals were included in our cohort. Admission culture rates remained stable from 2012 through 2019. Admission culturing rates and facility variability increased in 2020 and 2021 (Fig. 1). Post-admission culture rates decreased from 2012 to 2016 and then plateaued; increases in rates and facility variability were noted in 2020 and 2021 (Fig. 2). Admission blood cultures increased over time and admission urine cultures decreased; respiratory and other non-sterile site cultures increased in 2020 and 2021 (Fig. 3). Most types of post-admission cultures declined from 2012-2016; post-admission blood cultures increased between 2016-2021 (Fig. 4). Conclusion Both admission and post-admission cultures increased during the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, and these increases were driven by respiratory, other non-sterile, and blood cultures (which increased since 2016). Prior to 2020, culturing trends differed by specimen type and timing of culture. Assessing factors that contribute to testing tends and facility variability can inform diagnostic stewardship efforts and increase understanding of how testing changes may impact infection rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2254
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2098. Clinical culture rates among hospitalized patients in the United States, 2012-2021

James Baggs, Hannah Wolford, Sujan Reddy, Natalie McCarthy et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

P-2098. Clinical culture rates among hospitalized patients in the United States, 2012-2021

James Baggs, Hannah Wolford, Sujan Reddy, Natalie McCarthy, Joseph D. Lutgring
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Microbial cultures are used in clinical care and to track trends in infectious diseases. Changes in culturing practices may affect these trends but have not been thoroughly explored. This analysis examines temporal and facility variability of clinical cultures among a cohort of acute care hospitals in the U.S. from 2012-2021. Methods We used microbiology data from a dynamic cohort of hospitals reporting data to the PINC-AI Healthcare Database from 2012-2021. Surveillance cultures and hospitals with outlier hospital-months were excluded. We defined admission cultures as those collected on or before calendar day 3 of hospitalization and post-admission cultures as those collected after calendar day 3. Admission culture rates were calculated per 1,000 discharges. Post-admission culture rates were calculated per 1,000 patient days. We calculated overall rates as well as rates stratified by specimen source (blood, respiratory, urine, other sterile sites, and other non-sterile sites). To account for multiple blood culture sets, only the first blood culture per patient per day was counted in this analysis. Results From 2012-2021, 361 hospitals were included in our cohort. Admission culture rates remained stable from 2012 through 2019. Admission culturing rates and facility variability increased in 2020 and 2021 (Fig. 1). Post-admission culture rates decreased from 2012 to 2016 and then plateaued; increases in rates and facility variability were noted in 2020 and 2021 (Fig. 2). Admission blood cultures increased over time and admission urine cultures decreased; respiratory and other non-sterile site cultures increased in 2020 and 2021 (Fig. 3). Most types of post-admission cultures declined from 2012-2016; post-admission blood cultures increased between 2016-2021 (Fig. 4). Conclusion Both admission and post-admission cultures increased during the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, and these increases were driven by respiratory, other non-sterile, and blood cultures (which increased since 2016). Prior to 2020, culturing trends differed by specimen type and timing of culture. Assessing factors that contribute to testing tends and facility variability can inform diagnostic stewardship efforts and increase understanding of how testing changes may impact infection rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), CDC Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.