P-1918. Incidence of viral rebound in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Abstract Background Viral rebound, characterized by a resurgence of viral activity after initial suppression, presents a potential threat to infection control within healthcare settings. We aimed to investigate the incidence of viral rebound in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods The retrospective study included symptomatic adults admitted for COVID-19 to a tertiary hospital in Taiwan during 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. Viral rebound was defined as an increase of △Ct ≥ 5 units or a new positive test after having tested negative during 10-30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The indication of antiviral agent was evaluated by physician according to initial severity and risks to develop severe COVID-19. The patients with prior COVID-19 infections, receipt of ≥ 2 antiviral agents, incomplete treatment course of antiviral agent, or active problem for hospitalization other than COVID-19 were excluded. Results Of the included 354 participants, 26 received Paxlovid, 98 received molnupiravir, 54 received 3-day remdesivir, 101 received 5-day remdesivir, and 84 didn’t receive any antiviral agent. The incidence of viral rebound was higher in patients not receiving antiviral agent (n=75) compared to those who received either antiviral therapy (n=279) (17.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.18). Additionally, the duration from COVID-19 diagnosis to onset of viral rebound was similar between the two groups (16.2 days vs. 14.3 days, p=0.20). Among the 148 with severe COVID-19, viral rebound was higher in patients without antiviral agent exposure (n=47) compared to those who received 5-day remdesivir (n=101) (21.3% vs. 15.8%, p=0.18). In 206 with non-severe disease, no significant differences were found in the incidence of viral rebound between patients who received Paxlovid (n=26) and molnupiravir (n=98) (11.5% vs. 7.1%, p=0.44). Conclusion Our study highlights the risk of viral rebound in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients without antiviral treatment had a higher rebound incidence. Among severe cases, antiviral therapy reduced rebound rates, underscoring its importance. Interestingly, antiviral choice did not significantly affect rebound incidences in non-severe cases. These findings stress the crucial role of antiviral therapy in infection control strategies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2078
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1918. Incidence of viral rebound in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Tzu-Ping Weng, Nan–Yao Lee, Ming-Chi Li, Ling-Shan Syue
1 links
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

P-1918. Incidence of viral rebound in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Tzu-Ping Weng, Nan–Yao Lee, Ming-Chi Li, Ling-Shan Syue
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Viral rebound, characterized by a resurgence of viral activity after initial suppression, presents a potential threat to infection control within healthcare settings. We aimed to investigate the incidence of viral rebound in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Methods The retrospective study included symptomatic adults admitted for COVID-19 to a tertiary hospital in Taiwan during 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2022. Viral rebound was defined as an increase of △Ct ≥ 5 units or a new positive test after having tested negative during 10-30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The indication of antiviral agent was evaluated by physician according to initial severity and risks to develop severe COVID-19. The patients with prior COVID-19 infections, receipt of ≥ 2 antiviral agents, incomplete treatment course of antiviral agent, or active problem for hospitalization other than COVID-19 were excluded. Results Of the included 354 participants, 26 received Paxlovid, 98 received molnupiravir, 54 received 3-day remdesivir, 101 received 5-day remdesivir, and 84 didn’t receive any antiviral agent. The incidence of viral rebound was higher in patients not receiving antiviral agent (n=75) compared to those who received either antiviral therapy (n=279) (17.3% vs. 11.5%, p=0.18). Additionally, the duration from COVID-19 diagnosis to onset of viral rebound was similar between the two groups (16.2 days vs. 14.3 days, p=0.20). Among the 148 with severe COVID-19, viral rebound was higher in patients without antiviral agent exposure (n=47) compared to those who received 5-day remdesivir (n=101) (21.3% vs. 15.8%, p=0.18). In 206 with non-severe disease, no significant differences were found in the incidence of viral rebound between patients who received Paxlovid (n=26) and molnupiravir (n=98) (11.5% vs. 7.1%, p=0.44). Conclusion Our study highlights the risk of viral rebound in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients without antiviral treatment had a higher rebound incidence. Among severe cases, antiviral therapy reduced rebound rates, underscoring its importance. Interestingly, antiviral choice did not significantly affect rebound incidences in non-severe cases. These findings stress the crucial role of antiviral therapy in infection control strategies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.