P-205. Investigating PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Cycle Threshold’s Utility in Diagnosing and Treating Clostridioides difficile Infections

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile (C diff) is a pathobiont bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract that can cause morbidity and mortality and has public health implications. Guidelines suggest two-step testing to diagnose C diff infection (CDI). However, since polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can be positive in persons with colonization and no active disease, management of discordant results is challenging. Usage of facility-onset CDI as a quality metric further raises the need to accurately differentiate infection from colonization. We hypothesize PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values may be useful for quantifying C diff disease burden and differentiation of infection from colonization. However, Cts are currently unvalidated and are not currently approved for use for clinical decision making. Sample and results data for C diff infection and C diff PCR CT correlation This table provides an overview of our data investigating the usage of C diff PCR CT to better diagnose CDI Methods We performed a retrospective, single center chart review of patients who tested positive for C diff, and analyzed clinical and laboratory data in 2022. We excluded minors, outpatients, and repeat C diff episodes, and performed multi variable analyses. Results 70 patients met inclusion criteria. This cohort consisted of 37 (52.86%) male and 33 (47%) female patients. The mean and median ages were 70 and 73 years old respectively. Approximately 30 percent of our cohort was immunocompromised, and 90 percent of our patients were on antibiotics within 30 days of CDI testing. Using a Ct of 26.35, a cutoff used in previous studies to indicate infection, 30 patients (42.9%) had a positive Ct, and of these, 16 (53%), had a positive confirmatory enzyme immunoassay (EIA) . Ct of less than cutoff had a positive predictive value of 53%, and negative predictive value of 85%, for positive EIA. All patients analyzed underwent C diff treatment, with a mean length of treatment of 10 days. Mean time to recovery, classified as less than three documented bowel movements, or hospital discharge, was 4.6 days. Nine patients (13%) in our cohort died within 30 days of C diff testing. Conclusion This data show that C diff PCR Ct value threshold of < 26.35 combined with EIA positivity may be a helpful parameter for evaluating possible C diff. The demonstrated high negative predictive value may show a utility for high Ct values in ruling out active disease. Disclosures Roderick Go, DO, Aptose Biosciences: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Bristol Meyers Squibb: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Cytodyn Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi, Inc: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.409
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-205. Investigating PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Cycle Threshold’s Utility in Diagnosing and Treating Clostridioides difficile Infections

Edward T. Carey, Bennadette Maramara, Arthur H. Totten, Roderick Go et al.
1 links
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

P-205. Investigating PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Cycle Threshold’s Utility in Diagnosing and Treating Clostridioides difficile Infections

Edward T. Carey, Bennadette Maramara, Arthur H. Totten, Roderick Go, Matthew Jacob
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile (C diff) is a pathobiont bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract that can cause morbidity and mortality and has public health implications. Guidelines suggest two-step testing to diagnose C diff infection (CDI). However, since polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests can be positive in persons with colonization and no active disease, management of discordant results is challenging. Usage of facility-onset CDI as a quality metric further raises the need to accurately differentiate infection from colonization. We hypothesize PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values may be useful for quantifying C diff disease burden and differentiation of infection from colonization. However, Cts are currently unvalidated and are not currently approved for use for clinical decision making. Sample and results data for C diff infection and C diff PCR CT correlation This table provides an overview of our data investigating the usage of C diff PCR CT to better diagnose CDI Methods We performed a retrospective, single center chart review of patients who tested positive for C diff, and analyzed clinical and laboratory data in 2022. We excluded minors, outpatients, and repeat C diff episodes, and performed multi variable analyses. Results 70 patients met inclusion criteria. This cohort consisted of 37 (52.86%) male and 33 (47%) female patients. The mean and median ages were 70 and 73 years old respectively. Approximately 30 percent of our cohort was immunocompromised, and 90 percent of our patients were on antibiotics within 30 days of CDI testing. Using a Ct of 26.35, a cutoff used in previous studies to indicate infection, 30 patients (42.9%) had a positive Ct, and of these, 16 (53%), had a positive confirmatory enzyme immunoassay (EIA) . Ct of less than cutoff had a positive predictive value of 53%, and negative predictive value of 85%, for positive EIA. All patients analyzed underwent C diff treatment, with a mean length of treatment of 10 days. Mean time to recovery, classified as less than three documented bowel movements, or hospital discharge, was 4.6 days. Nine patients (13%) in our cohort died within 30 days of C diff testing. Conclusion This data show that C diff PCR Ct value threshold of < 26.35 combined with EIA positivity may be a helpful parameter for evaluating possible C diff. The demonstrated high negative predictive value may show a utility for high Ct values in ruling out active disease. Disclosures Roderick Go, DO, Aptose Biosciences: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Bristol Meyers Squibb: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Cytodyn Inc.: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi, Inc: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Stony Brook University Hospital (US), Stony Brook School (US), Stony Brook Medicine (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.