P-2080. Impact of the Implementation of Multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR Panel on Antimicrobial Use for Infectious Diarrhea

Abstract Background Rapid molecular methods, such as BioFire FilmArray™ Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel, have become common in clinical practice. The GI Panel identifies 22 GI pathogens in approximately 1 hour. We evaluated antimicrobial prescribing before and after the implementation of the GI Panel to see the impact on appropriate prescribing for infectious diarrhea and to identify quality improvement areas for antimicrobial stewardship moving forward.Figure 2:Percent Type of Antibiotic Change After Result of Diagnostic Testing Methods This retrospective cohort analysis compared antimicrobial prescribing practices for infectious diarrhea one year before and after the implementation of the BioFire GI Panel at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) in August 2021. Prior to GI Panel implementation at UMMC, the major diagnostic tests for infectious diarrhea were stool culture, ova and parasite smear, and a parasite PCR. Cases were randomly selected with an even distribution from each month from August 2019 to August 2022. Appropriateness of empiric and definitive management was assessed based on diarrhea type (bloody, acute, or prolonged), the patient's immune status, travel history, clinical presentation, and antibiotic selection. Results 353 patients were included: 179 pre-GI panel implementation and 174 post-implementation. Empiric antibiotic therapy for infectious diarrhea was started in 47/179 (26.3%) of the pre-panel group and 50/174 (28.7%) of the post-panel (P = 0.601). The diagnostic tests resulted in positive organism identification in 10% of patients in the pre-group, while positive identification increased to 19.4% post-group (P = 0.012). When an organism was identified, 12/33 (66.7%) of the post-panel group received antibiotic therapy, while only 6/18 (33.3%) of the pre-panel group received antibiotics (P = 0.83) Conclusion Our analysis showed that many patients did not have antimicrobial therapy for infectious diarrhea, which was impacted by the diagnostic test. The increased sensitivity to detect organisms in the GI Panel may account for the increased utilization of definitive antimicrobials in the post-implementation cohort. Disclosures J Kristie Johnson, PhD, D (ABMM), biomerieux: has given presentations/speeches for the company listed above Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, PhD, bioMérieux: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2236
Primary Topic
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2080. Impact of the Implementation of Multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR Panel on Antimicrobial Use for Infectious Diarrhea

Richard D. Smith, Paul M. Luethy, Kimberly C. Claeys, Blake R. Mangum et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
article

P-2080. Impact of the Implementation of Multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR Panel on Antimicrobial Use for Infectious Diarrhea

Richard D. Smith, Paul M. Luethy, Kimberly C. Claeys, Blake R. Mangum, Jennifer Kristie Johnson, Matthew Sandruck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Rapid molecular methods, such as BioFire FilmArray™ Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel, have become common in clinical practice. The GI Panel identifies 22 GI pathogens in approximately 1 hour. We evaluated antimicrobial prescribing before and after the implementation of the GI Panel to see the impact on appropriate prescribing for infectious diarrhea and to identify quality improvement areas for antimicrobial stewardship moving forward.Figure 2:Percent Type of Antibiotic Change After Result of Diagnostic Testing Methods This retrospective cohort analysis compared antimicrobial prescribing practices for infectious diarrhea one year before and after the implementation of the BioFire GI Panel at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) in August 2021. Prior to GI Panel implementation at UMMC, the major diagnostic tests for infectious diarrhea were stool culture, ova and parasite smear, and a parasite PCR. Cases were randomly selected with an even distribution from each month from August 2019 to August 2022. Appropriateness of empiric and definitive management was assessed based on diarrhea type (bloody, acute, or prolonged), the patient's immune status, travel history, clinical presentation, and antibiotic selection. Results 353 patients were included: 179 pre-GI panel implementation and 174 post-implementation. Empiric antibiotic therapy for infectious diarrhea was started in 47/179 (26.3%) of the pre-panel group and 50/174 (28.7%) of the post-panel (P = 0.601). The diagnostic tests resulted in positive organism identification in 10% of patients in the pre-group, while positive identification increased to 19.4% post-group (P = 0.012). When an organism was identified, 12/33 (66.7%) of the post-panel group received antibiotic therapy, while only 6/18 (33.3%) of the pre-panel group received antibiotics (P = 0.83) Conclusion Our analysis showed that many patients did not have antimicrobial therapy for infectious diarrhea, which was impacted by the diagnostic test. The increased sensitivity to detect organisms in the GI Panel may account for the increased utilization of definitive antimicrobials in the post-implementation cohort. Disclosures J Kristie Johnson, PhD, D (ABMM), biomerieux: has given presentations/speeches for the company listed above Kimberly C. Claeys, PharmD, PhD, bioMérieux: Advisor/Consultant|bioMérieux: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), University of Baltimore (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.