P-2077. Carbapenemase Resistance Detection by Direct Xpert Carba-R Assay on Flagged Blood Cultures

Abstract Background Early detection of carbapenem-resistant gram negative bacilli(CR-GNB) is critical in patients with sepsis. Delay in diagnosis leads to higher mortality. We evaluated the performance of the Xpert® Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) directly on flagged blood culture samples in patients with sepsis.Fig 1:Workflow Methods Patients with suspected sepsis with GNB on flagged blood culture were recruited. Xpert® Carba-R assay was performed directly on the positive sample. Their diagnostic performance was compared with culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST)(VITEK-2) and time to results were noted and compared.Table 1:Organism profile of patients with sepsis (n=57) Results In the study, 57 patients were included; Stenotrophomonas maltophila (n=17; 29.8%) was found to be the predominant isolate, which was excluded from analysis (being intrinsically resistant to carbapenems). This was followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14 ; 24.5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=10 ;17.5%), Escherichia coli (n=6;10.5%), Pseudomonas mendonica (n=3; 5.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=2;3.5%) and 1 each of Salmonella typhi, Serratia sp., Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter dendrificans, and Enterobacter sp. Xpert® Carba-R positivity was seen in 23/40 isolates (57.5%), and CR GNB was found in 25/40 isolates (62.5%) on routine DST. Discordant results were seen in 6/40 isolates (15%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of Xpert® Carba-R compared to routine DST (Disk diffusion method and VITEK-2) were 84%, 86.6% , 91.3%, 76.47 %, 6.30 and 0.18 respectively. On genomic analysis, most common CR gene expression was co-expression of NDM and OXA-48 [10/23 (43.5%)], followed by NDM [9/23 (39.1%)] and OXA-48 [4/23 (17.4%)]. The median time to obtain Carba-R result was 44 hours compared to 97 hours for detection of carbapenem resistance in routine DST, giving a 53-hour lead time.Table 2:Comparison of direct Xpert® Carba-R and DST ( disc diffusion method and Vitek-2) in various organisms Conclusion Xpert® Carba-R was found to have a good diagnostic performance for detection of carbapenem resistance when performed directly on positive blood culture samples with substantial time advantage over conventional methods.Fig 2:Distribution of Carbapenem resistant genes*Two discordant sampleCRO- Carbapenem resistant organismCSO- Carbapenem sensitive organism Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2233
Primary Topic
Vibrio bacteria research studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2077. Carbapenemase Resistance Detection by Direct Xpert Carba-R Assay on Flagged Blood Cultures

Akansha Didwania, Binit Kumar Singh, Naveet Wig, Sarita Mohapatra et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Vibrio bacteria research studies
article

P-2077. Carbapenemase Resistance Detection by Direct Xpert Carba-R Assay on Flagged Blood Cultures

Akansha Didwania, Binit Kumar Singh, Naveet Wig, Sarita Mohapatra, Sowjanya Perumalla, Parul Kodan, Manasvini Bhatt, Manish Soneja
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Early detection of carbapenem-resistant gram negative bacilli(CR-GNB) is critical in patients with sepsis. Delay in diagnosis leads to higher mortality. We evaluated the performance of the Xpert® Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) directly on flagged blood culture samples in patients with sepsis.Fig 1:Workflow Methods Patients with suspected sepsis with GNB on flagged blood culture were recruited. Xpert® Carba-R assay was performed directly on the positive sample. Their diagnostic performance was compared with culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST)(VITEK-2) and time to results were noted and compared.Table 1:Organism profile of patients with sepsis (n=57) Results In the study, 57 patients were included; Stenotrophomonas maltophila (n=17; 29.8%) was found to be the predominant isolate, which was excluded from analysis (being intrinsically resistant to carbapenems). This was followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14 ; 24.5%), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=10 ;17.5%), Escherichia coli (n=6;10.5%), Pseudomonas mendonica (n=3; 5.2%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=2;3.5%) and 1 each of Salmonella typhi, Serratia sp., Enterobacter cloacae, Acinetobacter dendrificans, and Enterobacter sp. Xpert® Carba-R positivity was seen in 23/40 isolates (57.5%), and CR GNB was found in 25/40 isolates (62.5%) on routine DST. Discordant results were seen in 6/40 isolates (15%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of Xpert® Carba-R compared to routine DST (Disk diffusion method and VITEK-2) were 84%, 86.6% , 91.3%, 76.47 %, 6.30 and 0.18 respectively. On genomic analysis, most common CR gene expression was co-expression of NDM and OXA-48 [10/23 (43.5%)], followed by NDM [9/23 (39.1%)] and OXA-48 [4/23 (17.4%)]. The median time to obtain Carba-R result was 44 hours compared to 97 hours for detection of carbapenem resistance in routine DST, giving a 53-hour lead time.Table 2:Comparison of direct Xpert® Carba-R and DST ( disc diffusion method and Vitek-2) in various organisms Conclusion Xpert® Carba-R was found to have a good diagnostic performance for detection of carbapenem resistance when performed directly on positive blood culture samples with substantial time advantage over conventional methods.Fig 2:Distribution of Carbapenem resistant genes*Two discordant sampleCRO- Carbapenem resistant organismCSO- Carbapenem sensitive organism Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Vibrio bacteria research studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.