P-199. Implementation of a Diagnostic Stewardship Initiative for Hospital Onset <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection

Abstract Background In response to increasing hospital onset CDI (HO-CDI), our Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) Program undertook a diagnostic stewardship initiative with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy of HO-CDI at our institution. Methods Data acquisition was performed at a single center hospital with 425 inpatient beds as part of hospital surveillance. HO-CDI was defined by the National Health Surveillance Network (NHSN) definitions. A total of 18 months were examined (1/1/23 – 3/31/24). On 11/1/23, the IPAC Program in coordination with the Microbiology Laboratory began suppressing the results for C. difficile on the multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR with the goal of prompting providers to consider pre-test probability of diagnosis and order each PCR separately. Data was compared 10 months prior to implementation and 5 months after implementation. Groups were compared by Fisher exact for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Results A total of 82 C. difficile PCR positive tests that met NHSN definitions for HO-CDI were recorded in the study period (Table 1). Of these, 13% of patients were deemed to have met testing criteria (≥3 bowel movements in a 24hr period, no tube feeds or laxatives in the preceding 24hrs). The most common potential disqualifier for testing was not meeting adequate number of bowel movements (47/82, 57%), followed by laxative use and tube feeds (44% and 28% respectively). Of all the positive tests, 9 (11%) were polymicrobial and none of the patients who had polymicrobial infections met testing criteria. The percentage of positive results coming from combined multiplex PCR and C. diff alone PCRs decreased after the intervention with 56% of positives being secondary to combined testing prior to the intervention compared to 32% after the intervention (p=0.078) (Fig 1). Median number of HO-CDI per month decreased after the intervention period along with the NSHSN standard infection rate (Fig 2). Conclusion Suppression of C. difficile results on multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR resulted in a decrease in this facility’s standard infection ration (SIR) for HO-CDI. Over three quarters of patients with positive results did not meet stool submission criteria. This has implications for possible next step educational initiatives. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.403
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-199. Implementation of a Diagnostic Stewardship Initiative for Hospital Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection

Lisa Townsend, Bernadette Thompson, Caitlin Bettger, John L Kiley
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

P-199. Implementation of a Diagnostic Stewardship Initiative for Hospital Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection

Lisa Townsend, Bernadette Thompson, Caitlin Bettger, John L Kiley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In response to increasing hospital onset CDI (HO-CDI), our Infection Prevention and Control (IPAC) Program undertook a diagnostic stewardship initiative with the goal of improving diagnostic accuracy of HO-CDI at our institution. Methods Data acquisition was performed at a single center hospital with 425 inpatient beds as part of hospital surveillance. HO-CDI was defined by the National Health Surveillance Network (NHSN) definitions. A total of 18 months were examined (1/1/23 – 3/31/24). On 11/1/23, the IPAC Program in coordination with the Microbiology Laboratory began suppressing the results for C. difficile on the multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR with the goal of prompting providers to consider pre-test probability of diagnosis and order each PCR separately. Data was compared 10 months prior to implementation and 5 months after implementation. Groups were compared by Fisher exact for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables. Results A total of 82 C. difficile PCR positive tests that met NHSN definitions for HO-CDI were recorded in the study period (Table 1). Of these, 13% of patients were deemed to have met testing criteria (≥3 bowel movements in a 24hr period, no tube feeds or laxatives in the preceding 24hrs). The most common potential disqualifier for testing was not meeting adequate number of bowel movements (47/82, 57%), followed by laxative use and tube feeds (44% and 28% respectively). Of all the positive tests, 9 (11%) were polymicrobial and none of the patients who had polymicrobial infections met testing criteria. The percentage of positive results coming from combined multiplex PCR and C. diff alone PCRs decreased after the intervention with 56% of positives being secondary to combined testing prior to the intervention compared to 32% after the intervention (p=0.078) (Fig 1). Median number of HO-CDI per month decreased after the intervention period along with the NSHSN standard infection rate (Fig 2). Conclusion Suppression of C. difficile results on multiplex Gastrointestinal PCR resulted in a decrease in this facility’s standard infection ration (SIR) for HO-CDI. Over three quarters of patients with positive results did not meet stool submission criteria. This has implications for possible next step educational initiatives. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Brooke Army Medical Center (US), Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center (US), San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (US)
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.