P-2075. Immunogenicity of co-administration of influenza vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine in healthy volunteers

Abstract Background The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and seasonal influenza results in a substantial disease burden worldwide. The immunogenicity of co-administering the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines was not well established, as co-administration may reduce the antibody response. The aim of the study is to evaluate the humoral immune response (HIR) and cell-mediated immune response (CMIR) of co-administration among healthy volunteers. Methods A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in Southern Thailand from March to April 2024. Healthy adults who had received at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine more than 6 months prior were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive the influenza vaccine (VaxigripTetra™) alone, the COVID-19 vaccine (bivalent mRNA BNT162b2) alone, or co-administration of both vaccines. T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2 by Interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISpot) assay and anti-receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-RBD IgG) level were measured before and 4 weeks after vaccination. The primary outcomes were the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of ELISpot and anti-RBD IgG level, with a lower bound 95% confidence interval (CI) > 0.67 for the non-inferiority margin (within 1.5-fold). The sample size was 12 per arm, according to the pilot study. Results Thirty-six participants were recruited. The enrollment and study flow are shown in Figure 1. Demographic data of participants are demonstrated in Table 1. Geometric means (GMs) for IFN-γ ELISpot and anti-RBD IgG are shown in Figure 2. GMRs between the co-administration and COVID-19 group were 1.03 (95% CI 0.43-2.44) for IFN-γ ELISpot and 0.82 (95% CI 0.52-1.29) for anti-RBD IgG, both failed to meet the non-inferiority margin due to the lower bound 95% CI < 0.67 (Figure 3). Mild solicited systemic adverse reactions in the influenza, COVID-19, and Co-administration groups were 8.3%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. Conclusion Co-administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines tended to show comparable both HIR and CMIR, as well as adverse reactions, with COVID-19 vaccination alone. This finding may support co-administration policy. According to pilot study, larger sample size study and effectiveness of vaccine co-administration need to be investigated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2231
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2075. Immunogenicity of co-administration of influenza vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine in healthy volunteers

Sorawit Chittrakarn, Pisud Siripaitoon, Siripen Kanchanasuwan, Nonthanat Tongsengkee et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

P-2075. Immunogenicity of co-administration of influenza vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine in healthy volunteers

Sorawit Chittrakarn, Pisud Siripaitoon, Siripen Kanchanasuwan, Nonthanat Tongsengkee, Narongdet Kositpantawong, Nawamin Pinpathomrat, Sarunyou Chusri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and seasonal influenza results in a substantial disease burden worldwide. The immunogenicity of co-administering the COVID-19 and influenza vaccines was not well established, as co-administration may reduce the antibody response. The aim of the study is to evaluate the humoral immune response (HIR) and cell-mediated immune response (CMIR) of co-administration among healthy volunteers. Methods A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in Southern Thailand from March to April 2024. Healthy adults who had received at least one dose of any COVID-19 vaccine more than 6 months prior were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive the influenza vaccine (VaxigripTetra™) alone, the COVID-19 vaccine (bivalent mRNA BNT162b2) alone, or co-administration of both vaccines. T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2 by Interferon gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISpot) assay and anti-receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-RBD IgG) level were measured before and 4 weeks after vaccination. The primary outcomes were the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of ELISpot and anti-RBD IgG level, with a lower bound 95% confidence interval (CI) > 0.67 for the non-inferiority margin (within 1.5-fold). The sample size was 12 per arm, according to the pilot study. Results Thirty-six participants were recruited. The enrollment and study flow are shown in Figure 1. Demographic data of participants are demonstrated in Table 1. Geometric means (GMs) for IFN-γ ELISpot and anti-RBD IgG are shown in Figure 2. GMRs between the co-administration and COVID-19 group were 1.03 (95% CI 0.43-2.44) for IFN-γ ELISpot and 0.82 (95% CI 0.52-1.29) for anti-RBD IgG, both failed to meet the non-inferiority margin due to the lower bound 95% CI < 0.67 (Figure 3). Mild solicited systemic adverse reactions in the influenza, COVID-19, and Co-administration groups were 8.3%, 75%, and 83%, respectively. Conclusion Co-administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines tended to show comparable both HIR and CMIR, as well as adverse reactions, with COVID-19 vaccination alone. This finding may support co-administration policy. According to pilot study, larger sample size study and effectiveness of vaccine co-administration need to be investigated. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.