The Abolition of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Africa and the Resentencing of the Innocent

The abolition of the mandatory death penalty in Africa has triggered resentencing processes for offenders on death row. Resentencing courts proceed on the basis that an offender is guilty; they are trial courts thus are not empowered to revisit the verdict. What should happen when a resentencing court opines that an offender is innocent of murder? Drawing from the experience in Malawi, this paper argues that a resentencing court has no more jurisdiction to impose a sentence on an offender than a trial court has to sentence an accused it acquits. Therefore, African nations that strike down the mandatory death penalty must provide for a procedure to provide exceptional circumstances in which a resentencing court can reconsider the conviction of the offender. The resentencing process calls for courts a proactive approach in achieving justice and upholding the rights of prisoners previously sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. At the very least, a court which realises that the accused is in fact innocent must not impose any further punishment on them because it then has no legal basis for knowingly sentencing an ‘innocent offender’. It is never justifiable to knowingly punish the innocent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives of Law and Public Administration.
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62768/plpa/2024/13/4/06
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Abolition of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Africa and the Resentencing of the Innocent

Esther Gumboh
1 citations
Perspectives of Law and Public Administration.
International Law and Human Rights
2.23
article

The Abolition of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Africa and the Resentencing of the Innocent

Esther Gumboh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The abolition of the mandatory death penalty in Africa has triggered resentencing processes for offenders on death row. Resentencing courts proceed on the basis that an offender is guilty; they are trial courts thus are not empowered to revisit the verdict. What should happen when a resentencing court opines that an offender is innocent of murder? Drawing from the experience in Malawi, this paper argues that a resentencing court has no more jurisdiction to impose a sentence on an offender than a trial court has to sentence an accused it acquits. Therefore, African nations that strike down the mandatory death penalty must provide for a procedure to provide exceptional circumstances in which a resentencing court can reconsider the conviction of the offender. The resentencing process calls for courts a proactive approach in achieving justice and upholding the rights of prisoners previously sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. At the very least, a court which realises that the accused is in fact innocent must not impose any further punishment on them because it then has no legal basis for knowingly sentencing an ‘innocent offender’. It is never justifiable to knowingly punish the innocent.

Perspectives of Law and Public Administration.Vol. 13(4)
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
International Law and Human Rights
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Abolition of the Mandatory Death Penalty in Africa and the Resentencing of the Innocent — Esther Gumboh · Perspectives of Law and Public Administration. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS