Privacy Is Important, but When Is It Thought About?

Consumers desire privacy, but their actions often seem to conflict (privacy paradox). Prior research focused on situations where privacy-decisions are focal (e.g., choosing passwords), recommending smoothing frictions or heightening attitude salience via contextual cues to address these inconsistencies. However, in many situations (e.g., shopping), even when consumers face privacy-relevant decisions (e.g., exchanging one’s email for discounts), privacy decisions are not part of the focal task. For these situations, we propose that thoughts about privacy are crowded out by task-related thoughts, even when encountering contextual cues that should trigger privacy thoughts. Across four studies, our findings suggest that thoughts about privacy, assessed by open-ended and indirect measures, are scarce and dwarfed by thoughts about the focal task. Furthermore, contextual cues (e.g., marketer requests for information, browsing situation) alone were generally insufficient to generate spontaneous thoughts about privacy. However, in combination with close-ended measures, contextual cues generated moderate levels of privacy-related thoughts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/735023
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy Is Important, but When Is It Thought About?

Kristin Diehl, Maansi Dalmia
2 citations
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
8.40
article

Privacy Is Important, but When Is It Thought About?

Kristin Diehl, Maansi Dalmia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Consumers desire privacy, but their actions often seem to conflict (privacy paradox). Prior research focused on situations where privacy-decisions are focal (e.g., choosing passwords), recommending smoothing frictions or heightening attitude salience via contextual cues to address these inconsistencies. However, in many situations (e.g., shopping), even when consumers face privacy-relevant decisions (e.g., exchanging one’s email for discounts), privacy decisions are not part of the focal task. For these situations, we propose that thoughts about privacy are crowded out by task-related thoughts, even when encountering contextual cues that should trigger privacy thoughts. Across four studies, our findings suggest that thoughts about privacy, assessed by open-ended and indirect measures, are scarce and dwarfed by thoughts about the focal task. Furthermore, contextual cues (e.g., marketer requests for information, browsing situation) alone were generally insufficient to generate spontaneous thoughts about privacy. However, in combination with close-ended measures, contextual cues generated moderate levels of privacy-related thoughts.

Journal of the Association for Consumer ResearchVol. 10(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Privacy Is Important, but When Is It Thought About? — Kristin Diehl, Maansi Dalmia · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS