Associations between affect variability, mean affect, and mental health among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic

<b>Objective:</b> The purpose of the study was to test whether associations between affect variability and mental health (i.e., anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, flourishing) differ by mean levels of affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> College students (<i>N</i> = 1883; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i>=19.81, <i>SD</i> = 1.33) completed a survey and 21 daily reports of affect (<i>M</i> = 19.41 surveys, <i>SD</i> = 4.19). We calculated mean affect and affect variability (i.e., standard deviation) from daily reports. Regression models then tested associations between positive and negative affect variability and mental health. <b>Results:</b> Participants with higher positive affect variability had higher anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and surprisingly higher flourishing. Higher negative affect variability was associated with poor mental health for individuals with low mean negative affect, and was associated with better mental health for individuals with high mean negative affect. <b>Conclusion:</b> Affect variability may simultaneously tax mental health for certain individuals and enable others to appreciate daily experiences and have better mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of American College Health
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2024.2449428
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between affect variability, mean affect, and mental health among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Stephanie T. Lanza, Gregory M. Fosco, Danny Rahal
Journal of American College Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Associations between affect variability, mean affect, and mental health among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Stephanie T. Lanza, Gregory M. Fosco, Danny Rahal
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The purpose of the study was to test whether associations between affect variability and mental health (i.e., anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, flourishing) differ by mean levels of affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods:</b> College students (<i>N</i> = 1883; <i>M<sub>age</sub></i>=19.81, <i>SD</i> = 1.33) completed a survey and 21 daily reports of affect (<i>M</i> = 19.41 surveys, <i>SD</i> = 4.19). We calculated mean affect and affect variability (i.e., standard deviation) from daily reports. Regression models then tested associations between positive and negative affect variability and mental health. <b>Results:</b> Participants with higher positive affect variability had higher anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and surprisingly higher flourishing. Higher negative affect variability was associated with poor mental health for individuals with low mean negative affect, and was associated with better mental health for individuals with high mean negative affect. <b>Conclusion:</b> Affect variability may simultaneously tax mental health for certain individuals and enable others to appreciate daily experiences and have better mental health.

Journal of American College HealthVol. 73(10)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.