314. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Meropenem-Vaborbactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections

Abstract Background Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasing in the United States, most commonly the result of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production. Both ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) are preferred treatment options for CRE infections but comparative effectiveness data to assist clinicians with preferentially selecting between these agents are limited. Baseline characteristics of 118 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales Methods We conducted an observational study of patients with CRE infections between 2018–2023 who received ≥ 3 days of CZA or MVB across five Maryland hospitals. Susceptibility to the administered agent (i.e., CZA or MVB) was required for eligibility. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) using propensity scores was used to assess the primary outcome of 30-day mortality. Development of resistance (i.e., ≥ 4-fold increase in MIC of the agent used to treat the index infection) within 90 days assessed by broth microdilution was a secondary outcome. Baseline characteristics of 75 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam for carbapenem-resistance Enterobacterales that harbored KPC genes Results In the entire cohort there were 95 and 23 patients in the CZA and MVB groups, respectively. Balance was achieved across all variables in the IPW cohort (Table 1). 30-day mortality was similar between the antibiotic groups comparing CZA to MVB (aOR 0.997, 95% CI 0.86–1.63, p=0.97) and in the subgroup of 75 patients with isolates with an identified blaKPC gene present who underwent IPW with good balance achieved (Table 2) (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85–1.21, p=0.87). Conclusion In a cohort of patients with CRE infections treated with either CZA or MVB, 30-day mortality was similar. The frequency of subsequent emergence of resistance is currently being investigated. Disclosures Sara M. Karaba, MD, PhD, MHS, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant Patricia J. Simner, PhD, Affinity Biosensors: Grant/Research Support|BD Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|bioMérieux: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Personal fees|GeneCapture: Personal Fees|Merck: Personal fees|OpGen Inc: Grant/Research Support|Qiagen: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Personal fees|T2 Biosystems: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.104
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

314. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Meropenem-Vaborbactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections

Sara E. Cosgrove, Sara M. Karaba, Pranita D. Tamma, Armani M. Hawes et al.
1 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.59
article

314. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Versus Meropenem-Vaborbactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections

Sara E. Cosgrove, Sara M. Karaba, Pranita D. Tamma, Armani M. Hawes, Yehudit Bergman, Suiyini Fiawoo, Patricia J. Simner, Dariusz A Hareza, Jae Hyoung Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are increasing in the United States, most commonly the result of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production. Both ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB) are preferred treatment options for CRE infections but comparative effectiveness data to assist clinicians with preferentially selecting between these agents are limited. Baseline characteristics of 118 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales Methods We conducted an observational study of patients with CRE infections between 2018–2023 who received ≥ 3 days of CZA or MVB across five Maryland hospitals. Susceptibility to the administered agent (i.e., CZA or MVB) was required for eligibility. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) using propensity scores was used to assess the primary outcome of 30-day mortality. Development of resistance (i.e., ≥ 4-fold increase in MIC of the agent used to treat the index infection) within 90 days assessed by broth microdilution was a secondary outcome. Baseline characteristics of 75 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam or meropenem-vaborbactam for carbapenem-resistance Enterobacterales that harbored KPC genes Results In the entire cohort there were 95 and 23 patients in the CZA and MVB groups, respectively. Balance was achieved across all variables in the IPW cohort (Table 1). 30-day mortality was similar between the antibiotic groups comparing CZA to MVB (aOR 0.997, 95% CI 0.86–1.63, p=0.97) and in the subgroup of 75 patients with isolates with an identified blaKPC gene present who underwent IPW with good balance achieved (Table 2) (aOR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85–1.21, p=0.87). Conclusion In a cohort of patients with CRE infections treated with either CZA or MVB, 30-day mortality was similar. The frequency of subsequent emergence of resistance is currently being investigated. Disclosures Sara M. Karaba, MD, PhD, MHS, Entasis: Advisor/Consultant Patricia J. Simner, PhD, Affinity Biosensors: Grant/Research Support|BD Diagnostics: Grant/Research Support|bioMérieux: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Personal fees|GeneCapture: Personal Fees|Merck: Personal fees|OpGen Inc: Grant/Research Support|Qiagen: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Personal fees|T2 Biosystems: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Shionogi
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
0.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.