P-1746. Evaluating Microbiology Reporting on Time to Appropriate Therapy for Organisms Producing Extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamases

Abstract Background Our Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) implemented specific treatment recommendations and suppression of select susceptibility results for microbiology reports positive for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and AmpC producing organisms. These statements also recommend Infectious Diseases (ID) consult if needed. This change is in alignment with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations.Figure 1:Microbiology lab reporting statementsA. ESBL organism statements. B. AmpC organism statements. Methods This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort of adult patients with monomicrobial infections due to organisms at high-risk for AmpC or ESBL production. The intervention was effective February 28th, 2023. See Figure 1. Data was collected by chart review for pre- and post-intervention groups from April 1st to September 30th, 2022, and April 1st to September 30th, 2023, respectively. The primary outcome was the time to appropriate definitive antibiotic administration. Appropriate antibiotic therapy was defined by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2023 Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections guidelines. Secondary outcomes included guideline-adherent antibiotic therapy, frequency of ID consultations, and inappropriate antibiotic de-escalation. Results Time to appropriate antibiotic administration was not significantly different between the pre- and post-intervention group (median time 8.6 hours vs. 8.3 hours, respectively). The frequency that patients received guideline-adherent therapy significantly increased between groups (pre- 67% vs post- 81%, p = 0.024). ID consultations also significantly increased (pre- 52% vs post- 77%, p = 0.005). Inappropriate de-escalation of therapy based on susceptibilities significantly decreased between groups (pre- 12% vs post- 2%, p = 0.047). Conclusion The implementation of microbiology reporting statements increased guideline-adherent definitive antibiotic therapy, increased ID consultations and decreased inappropriate antibiotic de-escalation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1909
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1746. Evaluating Microbiology Reporting on Time to Appropriate Therapy for Organisms Producing Extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamases

Nicole Harrington, Jennifer F. Kelly, Kelly A. Curran, Alison Samsel et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

P-1746. Evaluating Microbiology Reporting on Time to Appropriate Therapy for Organisms Producing Extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamases

Nicole Harrington, Jennifer F. Kelly, Kelly A. Curran, Alison Samsel, Julie Ing, Clint Borja
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Our Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) implemented specific treatment recommendations and suppression of select susceptibility results for microbiology reports positive for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and AmpC producing organisms. These statements also recommend Infectious Diseases (ID) consult if needed. This change is in alignment with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations.Figure 1:Microbiology lab reporting statementsA. ESBL organism statements. B. AmpC organism statements. Methods This study was a single-center, retrospective cohort of adult patients with monomicrobial infections due to organisms at high-risk for AmpC or ESBL production. The intervention was effective February 28th, 2023. See Figure 1. Data was collected by chart review for pre- and post-intervention groups from April 1st to September 30th, 2022, and April 1st to September 30th, 2023, respectively. The primary outcome was the time to appropriate definitive antibiotic administration. Appropriate antibiotic therapy was defined by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2023 Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections guidelines. Secondary outcomes included guideline-adherent antibiotic therapy, frequency of ID consultations, and inappropriate antibiotic de-escalation. Results Time to appropriate antibiotic administration was not significantly different between the pre- and post-intervention group (median time 8.6 hours vs. 8.3 hours, respectively). The frequency that patients received guideline-adherent therapy significantly increased between groups (pre- 67% vs post- 81%, p = 0.024). ID consultations also significantly increased (pre- 52% vs post- 77%, p = 0.005). Inappropriate de-escalation of therapy based on susceptibilities significantly decreased between groups (pre- 12% vs post- 2%, p = 0.047). Conclusion The implementation of microbiology reporting statements increased guideline-adherent definitive antibiotic therapy, increased ID consultations and decreased inappropriate antibiotic de-escalation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Christiana Care Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.