P-1747. Cost Avoidance Analysis of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Plan Reconciliation on Patients Enrolled in Value-Based Payment Models at an Academic Hospital

Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has many potential benefits, including avoidance of hospitalizations, reduced length of stay, and prevention of hospital-associated conditions. However, suboptimal OPAT delivery can result in readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits—outcomes that are unfavorable for patients and disincentivized within value-based care (VBC) models. Structured OPAT programs have been shown to decrease unscheduled healthcare use. Total cost of care (TCOC) analyses for OPAT program justification have not been well described. We therefore analyzed TCOC for a cohort of OPAT recipients enrolled in VBC pre- and post-implementation of OPAT plan reconciliation in June 2020. Methods Unique, adult OPAT patients discharged to home or post-acute care facilities from an academic hospital between 6/2019 and 6/2022 were included. Infectious diseases (ID) pharmacist reconciliation of OPAT plans prior to hospital discharge launched on 6/14/2020; all OPAT recipients discharged on or after this date were included in the post-implementation cohort. Average one-year post-intervention TCOC avoidance per patient was calculated using patient charges, a proxy for payor cost. The percentage of patients enrolled in a VBC plan was determined to calculate implied TCOC reduction annually. Results Nine hundred sixty-two OPAT patients were included: 198 pre- and 764 post-implementation. Fewer patients were included in the pre-intervention group given unretrievable financial data due to archiving rules. In our cohort, 16.9% of patients were enrolled in a VBC plan. Both pre- and post-intervention cohorts showed an increase in TCOC after index OPAT hospitalization; pre-intervention at 155% and post at 29%. This yielded a post-intervention average one-year cost avoidance of $15,754.55/patient. Based on our institution’s historical OPAT volume of 950 patients cared for annually, these data equate to an implied TCOC reduction of $2,529,409/year. Conclusion Implementation of formal ID pharmacist reconciliation of OPAT plans generated significant cost avoidance amongst OPAT patients enrolled in VBC plans. This is evidence that outcomes incentivized by VBC models align with outcomes facilitated by structured OPAT programs. Disclosures Jennifer Ross, PharmD, BCIDP, Shionogi Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1910
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1747. Cost Avoidance Analysis of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Plan Reconciliation on Patients Enrolled in Value-Based Payment Models at an Academic Hospital

Michael D. Evans, Jennifer Ross, Elizabeth B. Hirsch, Alison Galdys et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

P-1747. Cost Avoidance Analysis of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Plan Reconciliation on Patients Enrolled in Value-Based Payment Models at an Academic Hospital

Michael D. Evans, Jennifer Ross, Elizabeth B. Hirsch, Alison Galdys, Kimberly Boeser, William Sieling, Susan E Kline, Matt Hordyk, Bhupinder Manhani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has many potential benefits, including avoidance of hospitalizations, reduced length of stay, and prevention of hospital-associated conditions. However, suboptimal OPAT delivery can result in readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits—outcomes that are unfavorable for patients and disincentivized within value-based care (VBC) models. Structured OPAT programs have been shown to decrease unscheduled healthcare use. Total cost of care (TCOC) analyses for OPAT program justification have not been well described. We therefore analyzed TCOC for a cohort of OPAT recipients enrolled in VBC pre- and post-implementation of OPAT plan reconciliation in June 2020. Methods Unique, adult OPAT patients discharged to home or post-acute care facilities from an academic hospital between 6/2019 and 6/2022 were included. Infectious diseases (ID) pharmacist reconciliation of OPAT plans prior to hospital discharge launched on 6/14/2020; all OPAT recipients discharged on or after this date were included in the post-implementation cohort. Average one-year post-intervention TCOC avoidance per patient was calculated using patient charges, a proxy for payor cost. The percentage of patients enrolled in a VBC plan was determined to calculate implied TCOC reduction annually. Results Nine hundred sixty-two OPAT patients were included: 198 pre- and 764 post-implementation. Fewer patients were included in the pre-intervention group given unretrievable financial data due to archiving rules. In our cohort, 16.9% of patients were enrolled in a VBC plan. Both pre- and post-intervention cohorts showed an increase in TCOC after index OPAT hospitalization; pre-intervention at 155% and post at 29%. This yielded a post-intervention average one-year cost avoidance of $15,754.55/patient. Based on our institution’s historical OPAT volume of 950 patients cared for annually, these data equate to an implied TCOC reduction of $2,529,409/year. Conclusion Implementation of formal ID pharmacist reconciliation of OPAT plans generated significant cost avoidance amongst OPAT patients enrolled in VBC plans. This is evidence that outcomes incentivized by VBC models align with outcomes facilitated by structured OPAT programs. Disclosures Jennifer Ross, PharmD, BCIDP, Shionogi Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Elizabeth B. Hirsch, PharmD, FCCP, FIDSA, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Minnesota (US), Fairview Health Services (US), University of Minnesota System (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.