P-615. Knowledge, attitudes and practice towards routine vaccination among medical students, Kazakhstan, 2023

Abstract Background In Kazakhstan, coverage for childhood immunizations has decreased in recent years. Healthcare workers have the ability to increase vaccine coverage if they are sufficiently trained and have correct knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to routine immunizations. To assess whether interventions are needed in pre-service medical training, we needed to understand current vaccine KAP in medical students.Table 1.Participant characteristics Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among senior medical students in 3 universities in Karaganda, Astana and Almaty, from March to May 2023. We used multivariable logistic regression to test association with adequate knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP); threshold for adequate scores for questions in each domain was 70%. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.Figure 1.Factors associated with vaccine practice among medical students in Kazakhstan Results We interviewed 3,956 students: 1,716 (43%) in Astana, 1,313 (33%) in Almaty, and 927 (24%) in Karaganda. Of these, 74% were female, and 65% were 21-23 years old. Additionally, 89% were studying general medicine, 8% pediatrics, and 3% public health. Fewer than half (38%) reported having received training on vaccination. Adequate KAP scores were 11% for knowledge, 55% for attitudes, and 17% for practices. Most (74%) believed common myths about routine vaccinations, including 62% believing that the flu vaccine causes flu. Knowledge scores < 70% were associated with attitude scores < 70% (OR: 1.72; CI=1.37–2.17) and practice scores < 70% (OR: 1.66; CI=1.30–2.11). Attitude scores < 70% were associated with being male vs female (OR: 1.25; CI=1.07–1.47), living with anyone < 18 years old vs not (OR: 1.37; CI=1.08–1.73), and living in Astana vs Karaganda (OR: 1.69 CI=1.41–2.03). Practice scores < 70% were associated with living with anyone >65 years old vs not (OR: 1.32; CI=1.03–1.72), Islam religion vs no religion (OR: 2.03; CI=1.65–2.50) and having attitude score < 70% vs ≥70% (OR: 2.99; CI=2.45–3.66). Conclusion Our study revealed markedly low levels of correct KAP related to routine immunizations. These results demonstrate the need to increase training on vaccination among medical students, especially among pediatric and general medicine students who will be involved in immunizations. Trainings should address common myths about routine immunizations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.813
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-615. Knowledge, attitudes and practice towards routine vaccination among medical students, Kazakhstan, 2023

Dilyara Nabirova, Balaussa Zhuman, Roberta Horth, Arystan Balmagambetov
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

P-615. Knowledge, attitudes and practice towards routine vaccination among medical students, Kazakhstan, 2023

Dilyara Nabirova, Balaussa Zhuman, Roberta Horth, Arystan Balmagambetov
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In Kazakhstan, coverage for childhood immunizations has decreased in recent years. Healthcare workers have the ability to increase vaccine coverage if they are sufficiently trained and have correct knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to routine immunizations. To assess whether interventions are needed in pre-service medical training, we needed to understand current vaccine KAP in medical students.Table 1.Participant characteristics Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among senior medical students in 3 universities in Karaganda, Astana and Almaty, from March to May 2023. We used multivariable logistic regression to test association with adequate knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP); threshold for adequate scores for questions in each domain was 70%. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.Figure 1.Factors associated with vaccine practice among medical students in Kazakhstan Results We interviewed 3,956 students: 1,716 (43%) in Astana, 1,313 (33%) in Almaty, and 927 (24%) in Karaganda. Of these, 74% were female, and 65% were 21-23 years old. Additionally, 89% were studying general medicine, 8% pediatrics, and 3% public health. Fewer than half (38%) reported having received training on vaccination. Adequate KAP scores were 11% for knowledge, 55% for attitudes, and 17% for practices. Most (74%) believed common myths about routine vaccinations, including 62% believing that the flu vaccine causes flu. Knowledge scores < 70% were associated with attitude scores < 70% (OR: 1.72; CI=1.37–2.17) and practice scores < 70% (OR: 1.66; CI=1.30–2.11). Attitude scores < 70% were associated with being male vs female (OR: 1.25; CI=1.07–1.47), living with anyone < 18 years old vs not (OR: 1.37; CI=1.08–1.73), and living in Astana vs Karaganda (OR: 1.69 CI=1.41–2.03). Practice scores < 70% were associated with living with anyone >65 years old vs not (OR: 1.32; CI=1.03–1.72), Islam religion vs no religion (OR: 2.03; CI=1.65–2.50) and having attitude score < 70% vs ≥70% (OR: 2.99; CI=2.45–3.66). Conclusion Our study revealed markedly low levels of correct KAP related to routine immunizations. These results demonstrate the need to increase training on vaccination among medical students, especially among pediatric and general medicine students who will be involved in immunizations. Trainings should address common myths about routine immunizations. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Global Health Research Center of Central Asia (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.