P-1221. Benchmark Efficacy for Humanized Cefiderocol Plasma and Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid (ELF) Exposures Against Gram Negative Isolates in Standardized Murine Lung Infection Model

Abstract Background The collaboration for prevention and treatment of MDR bacterial infections (COMBINE) consortium have developed a standardized murine neutropenic lung infection model to align fundamental model elements to reduce inter-laboratory variability. We developed human simulated regimens (HSRs) based on both plasma and ELF exposures for cefiderocol in the COMBINE murine model and herein provide benchmark efficacy against a collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.Table 1.Phenotypic and genotypic information of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates Methods Following the COMBINE protocol for the preclinical murine lung model, neutropenic mice that received uranyl nitrate on day -3 to provide predictable renal impairment were administered 0.05 mL intranasal inoculums of K. pneumoniae (n=9) or P. aeruginosa (n=4) under isoflurane anesthesia. Isolate MICs were determined via BMD. Six mice per isolate were sacrificed 2h after inoculation to determine baseline bacterial burden, and 4-6 received saline control for 24h. Humanized exposures of cefiderocol 2g q8h as 3h infusion in plasma (5, 7.5, 10, 3.5, and 1 mg/kg at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6h, every 8h) and ELF (3.75, 5, 6.25, 1.75, and 1 mg/kg at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6h, every 8h) were administered to groups of 6 mice. Efficacy was measured in log10 CFU/lung at 24h compared with baseline bacterial burden.Figure 1.CFU/Lung data in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates following administration of humanized cefiderocol (2g q8h 3h infusion) plasma and ELF exposures in the COMBINE murine neutropenic lung infection model. Outlier mice determined by Tukey’s Test and displayed as individual dots. Results Cefiderocol MICs and genotypic information are presented in Table 1. The CFU/lung data for K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa isolates are displayed in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The K. pneumoniae isolates required higher log10 CFU/lung starting bacterial burden (mean ± SD, 7.23 ± 0.18) compared with P. aeruginosa (5.68 ± 0.24) to achieve adequate (≥ 1 log10 CFU/lung) growth in 24h controls. With the exception of PSA INT 4-99, the FDC plasma HSR, which over-exposes murine ELF relative to human, achieved greater average CFU reduction than the ELF HSR. Differences in CFU reduction between the matrix HSRs were most pronounced in the 2 isolates with MIC of 16 mg/L at the resistance breakpoint.Figure 2.CFU/Lung data in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates following administration of humanized cefiderocol (2g q8h 3h infusion) plasma and ELF exposures in the COMBINE murine neutropenic lung infection model. Conclusion These data provide a comparative benchmark for expected efficacy with humanized cefiderocol exposures of both plasma and ELF when using the COMBINE protocol. Humanizing exposures at the target site of infection may provide better clinical translation when interspecies differences in penetration from plasma exist. Disclosures Andrew J. Fratoni, PharmD, InsightRX: Grant/Research Support Erin Duffy, PhD, CARB-X: Employee David P. Nicolau, PharmD, CARB-X: Grant/Research Support|Innoviva: Grant/Research Support|Innoviva: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Honoraria|Venatorx: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1403
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1221. Benchmark Efficacy for Humanized Cefiderocol Plasma and Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid (ELF) Exposures Against Gram Negative Isolates in Standardized Murine Lung Infection Model

Erin M Duffy, Andrew J Fratoni, David P. Nicolau, Alissa M Padgett
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

P-1221. Benchmark Efficacy for Humanized Cefiderocol Plasma and Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid (ELF) Exposures Against Gram Negative Isolates in Standardized Murine Lung Infection Model

Erin M Duffy, Andrew J Fratoni, David P. Nicolau, Alissa M Padgett
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The collaboration for prevention and treatment of MDR bacterial infections (COMBINE) consortium have developed a standardized murine neutropenic lung infection model to align fundamental model elements to reduce inter-laboratory variability. We developed human simulated regimens (HSRs) based on both plasma and ELF exposures for cefiderocol in the COMBINE murine model and herein provide benchmark efficacy against a collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.Table 1.Phenotypic and genotypic information of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates Methods Following the COMBINE protocol for the preclinical murine lung model, neutropenic mice that received uranyl nitrate on day -3 to provide predictable renal impairment were administered 0.05 mL intranasal inoculums of K. pneumoniae (n=9) or P. aeruginosa (n=4) under isoflurane anesthesia. Isolate MICs were determined via BMD. Six mice per isolate were sacrificed 2h after inoculation to determine baseline bacterial burden, and 4-6 received saline control for 24h. Humanized exposures of cefiderocol 2g q8h as 3h infusion in plasma (5, 7.5, 10, 3.5, and 1 mg/kg at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6h, every 8h) and ELF (3.75, 5, 6.25, 1.75, and 1 mg/kg at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6h, every 8h) were administered to groups of 6 mice. Efficacy was measured in log10 CFU/lung at 24h compared with baseline bacterial burden.Figure 1.CFU/Lung data in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates following administration of humanized cefiderocol (2g q8h 3h infusion) plasma and ELF exposures in the COMBINE murine neutropenic lung infection model. Outlier mice determined by Tukey’s Test and displayed as individual dots. Results Cefiderocol MICs and genotypic information are presented in Table 1. The CFU/lung data for K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa isolates are displayed in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. The K. pneumoniae isolates required higher log10 CFU/lung starting bacterial burden (mean ± SD, 7.23 ± 0.18) compared with P. aeruginosa (5.68 ± 0.24) to achieve adequate (≥ 1 log10 CFU/lung) growth in 24h controls. With the exception of PSA INT 4-99, the FDC plasma HSR, which over-exposes murine ELF relative to human, achieved greater average CFU reduction than the ELF HSR. Differences in CFU reduction between the matrix HSRs were most pronounced in the 2 isolates with MIC of 16 mg/L at the resistance breakpoint.Figure 2.CFU/Lung data in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates following administration of humanized cefiderocol (2g q8h 3h infusion) plasma and ELF exposures in the COMBINE murine neutropenic lung infection model. Conclusion These data provide a comparative benchmark for expected efficacy with humanized cefiderocol exposures of both plasma and ELF when using the COMBINE protocol. Humanizing exposures at the target site of infection may provide better clinical translation when interspecies differences in penetration from plasma exist. Disclosures Andrew J. Fratoni, PharmD, InsightRX: Grant/Research Support Erin Duffy, PhD, CARB-X: Employee David P. Nicolau, PharmD, CARB-X: Grant/Research Support|Innoviva: Grant/Research Support|Innoviva: Honoraria|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Honoraria|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Honoraria|Venatorx: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Hartford Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.