P-829. Determination of novel clinical phenotypes among sepsis patients from an Indian sepsis registry

Abstract Background Sepsis is a dysregulated host immune response with heterogenous clinical presentation reflected in its high dimensional data and with distinct epidemiological profile endemic to LMICs such as India. The study aims to identify and estimate the prevalence of clinical phenotypes from retrospective data of sepsis patients from a South Indian registry. Characteristics of the identified clusters and outcomes Methods The registry enrolled all adult patients admitted through the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of sepsis following Surviving Sepsis Guidelines(SSG) criteria(Edathadathil F, 2022)1. Following Ordering points to identify the clustering structure(OPTICS) assessment, k-means clustering was identified and employed as unsupervised clustering method for deriving clusters. The association of focus of infection and outcomes among the clusters was assessed. The identified Indian clusters were compared to the phenotypic clusters derived by Seymour et al using distance matching2(Seymour et al, 2019). Distribution of focus of infection and causative pthogens among the clusters Results Of the 1009 patients enrolled in the registry, four clusters were identified with Cluster 1 exhibiting the highest prevalence and comprising 389 patients (39%), followed by Cluster 3 (254, 25%), Cluster 4 (225, 22.3%), and Cluster 2 (141, 14%). Age(p=0.024) and gender(p=0.04) significantly differed among the four clusters with septic shock (p< 0.001) and inhospital mortality (p< 0.001) significantly higher in Cluster 3 (septic shock at 19%, in hospital mortality at 32%)(Table 1). Among focus of infection, the prevalence of pneumonia (p=0.018), SSI(p=0.011) and bacteremia(p=0.004) significantly differed among the clusters (Fig 1). The proportion of bacteremia(29%) and pneumonia(28%) were observed to be significantly high in cluster 2. UTI(139, 38%) and SSI (57, 15%) were found to be significantly high in cluster 1. Pseudomonas (p=0.008) and staphylococcus aureus (p=0.02) were observed to be significantly different among the clusters. Clusters 1,2,3 and 4 exhibited close association to the gamma, beta, alpha and delta clusters respectively among the phenotypes derived by Seymour et al. Conclusion Our study has been one of the pioneer initiative in demonstrating inherent subgroups among sepsis patients within an Indian cohort data that significantly differed in outcomes and epidemiology. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1021
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-829. Determination of novel clinical phenotypes among sepsis patients from an Indian sepsis registry

Fabia Edathadathil, Georg Gutajhr, Dipu T Sathyapalan, Sanjeev Singh
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

P-829. Determination of novel clinical phenotypes among sepsis patients from an Indian sepsis registry

Fabia Edathadathil, Georg Gutajhr, Dipu T Sathyapalan, Sanjeev Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Sepsis is a dysregulated host immune response with heterogenous clinical presentation reflected in its high dimensional data and with distinct epidemiological profile endemic to LMICs such as India. The study aims to identify and estimate the prevalence of clinical phenotypes from retrospective data of sepsis patients from a South Indian registry. Characteristics of the identified clusters and outcomes Methods The registry enrolled all adult patients admitted through the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of sepsis following Surviving Sepsis Guidelines(SSG) criteria(Edathadathil F, 2022)1. Following Ordering points to identify the clustering structure(OPTICS) assessment, k-means clustering was identified and employed as unsupervised clustering method for deriving clusters. The association of focus of infection and outcomes among the clusters was assessed. The identified Indian clusters were compared to the phenotypic clusters derived by Seymour et al using distance matching2(Seymour et al, 2019). Distribution of focus of infection and causative pthogens among the clusters Results Of the 1009 patients enrolled in the registry, four clusters were identified with Cluster 1 exhibiting the highest prevalence and comprising 389 patients (39%), followed by Cluster 3 (254, 25%), Cluster 4 (225, 22.3%), and Cluster 2 (141, 14%). Age(p=0.024) and gender(p=0.04) significantly differed among the four clusters with septic shock (p< 0.001) and inhospital mortality (p< 0.001) significantly higher in Cluster 3 (septic shock at 19%, in hospital mortality at 32%)(Table 1). Among focus of infection, the prevalence of pneumonia (p=0.018), SSI(p=0.011) and bacteremia(p=0.004) significantly differed among the clusters (Fig 1). The proportion of bacteremia(29%) and pneumonia(28%) were observed to be significantly high in cluster 2. UTI(139, 38%) and SSI (57, 15%) were found to be significantly high in cluster 1. Pseudomonas (p=0.008) and staphylococcus aureus (p=0.02) were observed to be significantly different among the clusters. Clusters 1,2,3 and 4 exhibited close association to the gamma, beta, alpha and delta clusters respectively among the phenotypes derived by Seymour et al. Conclusion Our study has been one of the pioneer initiative in demonstrating inherent subgroups among sepsis patients within an Indian cohort data that significantly differed in outcomes and epidemiology. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.