P-839. Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Pathogen Detection in Patients with <i>Escherichia coli</i> Bloodstream Infections

Abstract Background Rapid diagnosis and early administration of appropriate antimicrobials are crucial to improve the prognosis and decrease the mortality of patients with bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a new tool for pathogen detection in BSIs. This study aimed to examine the sensitivity of ddPCR and explore the association between bacterial DNA load in whole blood and time-to-positivity (TTP) of blood cultures (BCs) in patients with Escherichia coli BSIs. Relationship between E. coli DNA load in whole blood and time-to-positivity of blood cultures Methods This prospective study included 59 patients with E. coli BSIs confirmed using BCs enrolled at the Hiroshima University Hospital between June, 2023 and April, 2024. The E. coli DNA load in whole blood, which was simultaneously obtained from two sets of BCs, was evaluated using ddPCR. For each patient, only the TTP of the first positive BC obtained using the BacT/ALERT Virtuo System was used for analysis. Results The median TTP was 9.0 (IQR: 8.3–10.2) h, and 15.2% (9/59) of the patients exhibited septic shock during BC sampling. In 83.1% (49/59) of the whole blood samples, E. coli DNA was detected via ddPCR. Patients with positive ddPCR results exhibited significantly shorter TTP than those with negative ddPCR results (median TTP: 8.8 vs. 10.5 h; p &amp;lt; 0.001). The rate of positive results for both sets of BCs was significantly higher in patients with positive ddPCR results than in those with negative ddPCR results (87.8 vs. 40.0%, p = 0.003). The E. coli DNA load was 75–200,475 copies/mL. Moreover, ddPCR revealed a significant correlation between the E. coli DNA load in whole blood and TTP (r: –0.58; 95% confidence interval: –0.74 to –0.36; p &amp;lt; 0.001). All patients with septic shock exhibited positive ddPCR results and significantly higher E. coli DNA loads in whole blood than those without septic shock (median E. coli DNA load: 6,375 vs. 113 copies/mL; p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusion Overall, ddPCR effectively detected E. coli DNA in the whole blood of patients with septic shock with a relatively short TTP. Notably, E. coli DNA load was associated with the infection severity of the patient. Further optimization of the bacterial DNA extraction protocol from blood and reaction systems and conditions can enhance the sensitivity of ddPCR. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1031
Primary Topic
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-839. Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Pathogen Detection in Patients with Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections

Masato Kojima, Kayoko Tadera, Hiroki Ohge, Norifumi Shigemoto et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
article

P-839. Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Pathogen Detection in Patients with Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections

Masato Kojima, Kayoko Tadera, Hiroki Ohge, Norifumi Shigemoto, Toshihito Nomura, Hiroki Kitagawa, Keitaro Omori
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Rapid diagnosis and early administration of appropriate antimicrobials are crucial to improve the prognosis and decrease the mortality of patients with bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a new tool for pathogen detection in BSIs. This study aimed to examine the sensitivity of ddPCR and explore the association between bacterial DNA load in whole blood and time-to-positivity (TTP) of blood cultures (BCs) in patients with Escherichia coli BSIs. Relationship between E. coli DNA load in whole blood and time-to-positivity of blood cultures Methods This prospective study included 59 patients with E. coli BSIs confirmed using BCs enrolled at the Hiroshima University Hospital between June, 2023 and April, 2024. The E. coli DNA load in whole blood, which was simultaneously obtained from two sets of BCs, was evaluated using ddPCR. For each patient, only the TTP of the first positive BC obtained using the BacT/ALERT Virtuo System was used for analysis. Results The median TTP was 9.0 (IQR: 8.3–10.2) h, and 15.2% (9/59) of the patients exhibited septic shock during BC sampling. In 83.1% (49/59) of the whole blood samples, E. coli DNA was detected via ddPCR. Patients with positive ddPCR results exhibited significantly shorter TTP than those with negative ddPCR results (median TTP: 8.8 vs. 10.5 h; p &amp;lt; 0.001). The rate of positive results for both sets of BCs was significantly higher in patients with positive ddPCR results than in those with negative ddPCR results (87.8 vs. 40.0%, p = 0.003). The E. coli DNA load was 75–200,475 copies/mL. Moreover, ddPCR revealed a significant correlation between the E. coli DNA load in whole blood and TTP (r: –0.58; 95% confidence interval: –0.74 to –0.36; p &amp;lt; 0.001). All patients with septic shock exhibited positive ddPCR results and significantly higher E. coli DNA loads in whole blood than those without septic shock (median E. coli DNA load: 6,375 vs. 113 copies/mL; p &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusion Overall, ddPCR effectively detected E. coli DNA in the whole blood of patients with septic shock with a relatively short TTP. Notably, E. coli DNA load was associated with the infection severity of the patient. Further optimization of the bacterial DNA extraction protocol from blood and reaction systems and conditions can enhance the sensitivity of ddPCR. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Hiroshima University (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.