P-94. Can Fluoroquinolones Be Used for the Treatment of Deep-Seated <i>Streptococcus anginosus</i> group Infections?

Abstract Background Invasive infections caused by Streptococcus anginosus group are increasingly common. Some experts recommend against treatment with fluoroquinolone (FQs) dues to potential development of fluoroquinolone resistance; however, this is not based on clinical data. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of FQ-based antibiotic regimens with non-FQ regimens for the treatment of deep-seated S. anginosus group infections. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized at Denver Health Medical center between 4/1/2016 and 10/31/2023 with a deep-seated infection and isolation of S. anginosus group from tissue, bone, synovial or pleural fluid. Cases were categorized as having been treated with a fluoroquinolone as part of their antibiotic regimen or not. The primary outcome was treatment success at 90 days as defined as absence of the following: recurrent infection, need for repeat surgical intervention or hospital readmission related to the primary infection. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related adverse events and central venous catheter complications. Results 144 cases of deep-seated infection involving a S. anginosus group were identified; 69 received a FQ while 75 were treated with other antibiotics. Those in the FQ group were more likely to discharge on oral antibiotics (64 [93%] vs. 40 [53%], p&amp;lt; .001) and had a shorter duration of intravenous therapy (2 days vs. 13 days, p&amp;lt; .001). Treatment success occurred in 62 (90%) patients in the FQ group and 69 (92%) patients in the non-FQ group (p=0.65). Rates of antibiotic-related adverse events and vascular complications were similar between groups. Of patients who received a FQ, no patients had treatment failure or recurrent infection with an isolate resistant to a FQ. Conclusion FQs appeared to be a safe and effective treatment option for deep-seated S. anginosus group infections and facilitated early transition to oral therapy, while the development of FQ resistance was not observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.301
Primary Topic
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-94. Can Fluoroquinolones Be Used for the Treatment of Deep-Seated Streptococcus anginosus group Infections?

Joshua A. Parry, Timothy C Jenkins, Heather Young, Whitney Miller et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
article

P-94. Can Fluoroquinolones Be Used for the Treatment of Deep-Seated Streptococcus anginosus group Infections?

Joshua A. Parry, Timothy C Jenkins, Heather Young, Whitney Miller, Sebastian Studnicka, Nicole Delino
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Invasive infections caused by Streptococcus anginosus group are increasingly common. Some experts recommend against treatment with fluoroquinolone (FQs) dues to potential development of fluoroquinolone resistance; however, this is not based on clinical data. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of FQ-based antibiotic regimens with non-FQ regimens for the treatment of deep-seated S. anginosus group infections. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized at Denver Health Medical center between 4/1/2016 and 10/31/2023 with a deep-seated infection and isolation of S. anginosus group from tissue, bone, synovial or pleural fluid. Cases were categorized as having been treated with a fluoroquinolone as part of their antibiotic regimen or not. The primary outcome was treatment success at 90 days as defined as absence of the following: recurrent infection, need for repeat surgical intervention or hospital readmission related to the primary infection. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related adverse events and central venous catheter complications. Results 144 cases of deep-seated infection involving a S. anginosus group were identified; 69 received a FQ while 75 were treated with other antibiotics. Those in the FQ group were more likely to discharge on oral antibiotics (64 [93%] vs. 40 [53%], p&amp;lt; .001) and had a shorter duration of intravenous therapy (2 days vs. 13 days, p&amp;lt; .001). Treatment success occurred in 62 (90%) patients in the FQ group and 69 (92%) patients in the non-FQ group (p=0.65). Rates of antibiotic-related adverse events and vascular complications were similar between groups. Of patients who received a FQ, no patients had treatment failure or recurrent infection with an isolate resistant to a FQ. Conclusion FQs appeared to be a safe and effective treatment option for deep-seated S. anginosus group infections and facilitated early transition to oral therapy, while the development of FQ resistance was not observed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Denver Health Medical Center (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.