The challenges of policy oversight for the European Parliament: how the committee system is adapting in its scrutiny of budgetary expenditure

In its scrutiny role the European Parliament (EP) makes wide use of several informational resources, including Commission evaluations and European Court of Auditors' performance audits. These crucial inputs into deliberative processes of parliamentary oversight enable committees to monitor the performance of policies financed by the EU budget. Effective scrutiny is fundamental for the throughput legitimacy and financial accountability of EU policy and law making. Traditionally the EP's Budgetary Control Committee (CONT) has scrutinised ECA reports across all policy domains. However, during the eighth and ninth legislatures (2014-2024), direct contact has been forged between the standing committees and ECA for the presentation of audit findings, allowing committees a more retrospective perspective on policy performance. Arguably, greater engagement and understanding of budgetary control helps the EP as co-legislator deliver improved regulation and better designed policy instruments. This article explores the evolving nature of EP-ECA committee relations and institutionalisation of new scrutiny arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Legislative Studies
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2024.2444772
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenges of policy oversight for the European Parliament: how the committee system is adapting in its scrutiny of budgetary expenditure

Paul Stephenson
1 citations
Journal of Legislative Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
8.52
article

The challenges of policy oversight for the European Parliament: how the committee system is adapting in its scrutiny of budgetary expenditure

Paul Stephenson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In its scrutiny role the European Parliament (EP) makes wide use of several informational resources, including Commission evaluations and European Court of Auditors' performance audits. These crucial inputs into deliberative processes of parliamentary oversight enable committees to monitor the performance of policies financed by the EU budget. Effective scrutiny is fundamental for the throughput legitimacy and financial accountability of EU policy and law making. Traditionally the EP's Budgetary Control Committee (CONT) has scrutinised ECA reports across all policy domains. However, during the eighth and ninth legislatures (2014-2024), direct contact has been forged between the standing committees and ECA for the presentation of audit findings, allowing committees a more retrospective perspective on policy performance. Arguably, greater engagement and understanding of budgetary control helps the EP as co-legislator deliver improved regulation and better designed policy instruments. This article explores the evolving nature of EP-ECA committee relations and institutionalisation of new scrutiny arrangements.

Journal of Legislative StudiesVol. 31(2)
Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
European Union Policy and Governance
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.