P-1109. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin for the treatment of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection: clinical and microbiome evaluation

Abstract Background Ibezapolstat (IBZ) is Gram-positive selective spectrum antibiotic that inhibits the bacterial DNA polymerase IIIC currently in clinical trial development for the treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI) in adults. In the open-label, non-comparative, phase 2a study, 10 of 10 IBZ-treated CDI patients experienced clinical cure. The purpose of the phase 2b CDI study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and microbiome change of IBZ versus vancomycin (VAN). Methods Phase 2b (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04247542) was a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator study. Participants with signs and symptoms of CDI and a positive enzyme immunoassay toxin test result were recruited from 12 centers in the USA and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral IBZ 450 mg every 12 h or oral VAN 125 mg every 6 h for 10 days. Stool was collected daily for microbiome evaluations. The primary endpoints were clinical cure at the end of therapy visit and safety. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic and microbiome evaluations. Results Thirty patients were recruited and were assessed in the per protocol analysis. (IBZ: n=16; VAN n=14). Fifteen of 16 (93.8%) patients given IBZ had a clinical cure versus 14 of 14 (100%) patients given VAN. IBZ and VAN were well tolerated with no serious drug-related events. C. difficile was eradicated from all stool samples after day 3 of treatment for IBZ-treated patients while three VAN-treated patients had C. difficile growth after day 3. IBZ demonstrated consistent preservation of key Bacillota species while significant decreases were observed in VAN-treated patients. CDI recurrence occurred in two patients given VAN and no patients given IBZ. Conclusion In the phase 2b study, IBZ had a clinically comparable cure rate and safety profile to oral vancomycin. Favorable microbiologic and microbiome findings were observed with IBZ-treated patients along with a lower rate of CDI recurrence. These results warrant further development in phase 3 trials. Disclosures Michael Silverman, MD, Acurx: Advisor/Consultant Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1297
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1109. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: clinical and microbiome evaluation

Michael H. Silverman, Mohammad Jahangir Alam, Jacob McPherson, Taryn A Eubank et al.
1 citations
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.40
article

P-1109. A phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of ibezapolstat compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: clinical and microbiome evaluation

Michael H. Silverman, Mohammad Jahangir Alam, Jacob McPherson, Taryn A Eubank, Kevin W. Garey, Jinhee Jo, Khurshida Begum
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Ibezapolstat (IBZ) is Gram-positive selective spectrum antibiotic that inhibits the bacterial DNA polymerase IIIC currently in clinical trial development for the treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI) in adults. In the open-label, non-comparative, phase 2a study, 10 of 10 IBZ-treated CDI patients experienced clinical cure. The purpose of the phase 2b CDI study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and microbiome change of IBZ versus vancomycin (VAN). Methods Phase 2b (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04247542) was a randomized, double-blind, active-comparator study. Participants with signs and symptoms of CDI and a positive enzyme immunoassay toxin test result were recruited from 12 centers in the USA and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral IBZ 450 mg every 12 h or oral VAN 125 mg every 6 h for 10 days. Stool was collected daily for microbiome evaluations. The primary endpoints were clinical cure at the end of therapy visit and safety. Secondary endpoints included microbiologic and microbiome evaluations. Results Thirty patients were recruited and were assessed in the per protocol analysis. (IBZ: n=16; VAN n=14). Fifteen of 16 (93.8%) patients given IBZ had a clinical cure versus 14 of 14 (100%) patients given VAN. IBZ and VAN were well tolerated with no serious drug-related events. C. difficile was eradicated from all stool samples after day 3 of treatment for IBZ-treated patients while three VAN-treated patients had C. difficile growth after day 3. IBZ demonstrated consistent preservation of key Bacillota species while significant decreases were observed in VAN-treated patients. CDI recurrence occurred in two patients given VAN and no patients given IBZ. Conclusion In the phase 2b study, IBZ had a clinically comparable cure rate and safety profile to oral vancomycin. Favorable microbiologic and microbiome findings were observed with IBZ-treated patients along with a lower rate of CDI recurrence. These results warrant further development in phase 3 trials. Disclosures Michael Silverman, MD, Acurx: Advisor/Consultant Kevin W. Garey, PharmD, MS, Acurx: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.