P-1679. Discrepancies in antibiotic prescribing: revealing inappropriate use patterns

Abstract Background Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing fuels antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and compromises patient outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic use across various agents and antibiotic groups.Table 1.Assessment of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns by Antibiotic Type Methods A retrospective analysis of 1647 cases evaluated antibiotic prescribing patterns. We assessed both prescription rates and prevalence ratios (PR) to examine the appropriateness of antibiotic choice within and across groups.Table 2.Comparative analysis of prevalence factors for various antimicrobial groups Results Prescription rates indicated higher rates of inappropriate use for meropenem (22.8%) and carbapenems (20%) compared to other agents and groups. Conversely, PR analysis revealed a significantly lower likelihood of inappropriate prescribing for cephalosporins compared to carbapenems (adjusted PR: 0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.66, p < 0.001). Glycylcyclines exhibited a markedly higher risk of inappropriate use (adjusted PR: 3.00, 95%CI 1.44-6.24, p=0.003), while glucopeptides also demonstrated a propensity for inappropriate prescribing (adjusted PR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.12-1.89, p=0.004). Conclusion our study reveals notable discrepancies in the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions across different agents and antibiotic groups. While the analysis based on prescription rates demonstrated higher rates of inappropriate use for meropenem and carbapenems overall, prevalence ratio analysis highlighted specific trends within antibiotic classes. Cefalosporins consistently demonstrated a lower likelihood of inappropriate prescribing compared to carbapenems, suggesting their preferential use in clinical practice. However, caution is warranted with glicylcyclines, which exhibited a higher risk of inappropriate prescription. These findings underscore the importance of tailored interventions to optimize antibiotic prescribing practices, mitigate antimicrobial resistance, and improve patient outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1845
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1679. Discrepancies in antibiotic prescribing: revealing inappropriate use patterns

María Luna-González, Miguel Ochoa, Edgar Augusto Bernal-García, Andrea P Silva-Pereira et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1679. Discrepancies in antibiotic prescribing: revealing inappropriate use patterns

María Luna-González, Miguel Ochoa, Edgar Augusto Bernal-García, Andrea P Silva-Pereira, Anderson F Arias-Ariza
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing fuels antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and compromises patient outcomes. This study aimed to elucidate the prevalence and factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic use across various agents and antibiotic groups.Table 1.Assessment of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns by Antibiotic Type Methods A retrospective analysis of 1647 cases evaluated antibiotic prescribing patterns. We assessed both prescription rates and prevalence ratios (PR) to examine the appropriateness of antibiotic choice within and across groups.Table 2.Comparative analysis of prevalence factors for various antimicrobial groups Results Prescription rates indicated higher rates of inappropriate use for meropenem (22.8%) and carbapenems (20%) compared to other agents and groups. Conversely, PR analysis revealed a significantly lower likelihood of inappropriate prescribing for cephalosporins compared to carbapenems (adjusted PR: 0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.66, p < 0.001). Glycylcyclines exhibited a markedly higher risk of inappropriate use (adjusted PR: 3.00, 95%CI 1.44-6.24, p=0.003), while glucopeptides also demonstrated a propensity for inappropriate prescribing (adjusted PR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.12-1.89, p=0.004). Conclusion our study reveals notable discrepancies in the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions across different agents and antibiotic groups. While the analysis based on prescription rates demonstrated higher rates of inappropriate use for meropenem and carbapenems overall, prevalence ratio analysis highlighted specific trends within antibiotic classes. Cefalosporins consistently demonstrated a lower likelihood of inappropriate prescribing compared to carbapenems, suggesting their preferential use in clinical practice. However, caution is warranted with glicylcyclines, which exhibited a higher risk of inappropriate prescription. These findings underscore the importance of tailored interventions to optimize antibiotic prescribing practices, mitigate antimicrobial resistance, and improve patient outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.