581. Enhancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Access, and Justice (DEIAJ) Teaching in Infectious Diseases: Current State and Future Directions in Faculty Development

Abstract Background Infectious Diseases (ID) clinicians occupy a unique position at the interface of clinical medicine and social justice. Medical education in ID therefore presents a rich opportunity for trainees to cultivate critical consciousness in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Access, and Justice (DEIAJ). Research has focused on improving DEIAJ education for ID fellows and attendings (Gleeson et al., 2023, Vasishta et al., 2023 ), but little is known about ID faculty members’ perceptions of DEIAJ teaching. We aim to explore ID faculty members’ attitudes and experiences discussing DEIAJ topics when teaching clinically. Methods Clinical ID attendings at the University of Michigan were invited to complete an anonymous survey. Open-ended questions assessed which ID-related DEIAJ topics faculty members believe are most important for students to learn. Likert-style questions evaluated comfort and preparedness regarding DEIAJ teaching, while multiple choice questions explored barriers to covering this content and faculty development preferences. Results Survey response rate was 81% (22/27), with a 63% completion rate. Faculty comfort with DEIAJ teaching was high, while reported preparedness was only moderate (Figures 1, 2). Common perceived barriers to DEIAJ teaching were lack of facilitation skills (50%) and fear of trainee criticism (42%). Preferred modes for faculty development were DEIAJ integration in conferences (85%), facilitation training (57%), and access to DEIAJ teaching cases (50%). Respondents identified common and important DEIAJ teaching topics that arise in ID clinical practice (Figure 3). Conclusion This single-institution study reveals that ID attendings are comfortable addressing DEIAJ topics in their clinical teaching despite not feeling optimally prepared. Identifying this comfort-preparation gap in our division, as well as preferred faculty development modalities and prioritized DEIAJ topics within ID, is the first step in creating integrated professional development opportunities that capitalize on faculty members’ dedication to DEIAJ teaching. Exploration of this issue on a national scale could support development of a customizable professional development toolkit for the broader ID community. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.176
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

581. Enhancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Access, and Justice (DEIAJ) Teaching in Infectious Diseases: Current State and Future Directions in Faculty Development

Emily Abdoler, H. Dean Nielsen
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

581. Enhancing Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Access, and Justice (DEIAJ) Teaching in Infectious Diseases: Current State and Future Directions in Faculty Development

Emily Abdoler, H. Dean Nielsen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Infectious Diseases (ID) clinicians occupy a unique position at the interface of clinical medicine and social justice. Medical education in ID therefore presents a rich opportunity for trainees to cultivate critical consciousness in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Access, and Justice (DEIAJ). Research has focused on improving DEIAJ education for ID fellows and attendings (Gleeson et al., 2023, Vasishta et al., 2023 ), but little is known about ID faculty members’ perceptions of DEIAJ teaching. We aim to explore ID faculty members’ attitudes and experiences discussing DEIAJ topics when teaching clinically. Methods Clinical ID attendings at the University of Michigan were invited to complete an anonymous survey. Open-ended questions assessed which ID-related DEIAJ topics faculty members believe are most important for students to learn. Likert-style questions evaluated comfort and preparedness regarding DEIAJ teaching, while multiple choice questions explored barriers to covering this content and faculty development preferences. Results Survey response rate was 81% (22/27), with a 63% completion rate. Faculty comfort with DEIAJ teaching was high, while reported preparedness was only moderate (Figures 1, 2). Common perceived barriers to DEIAJ teaching were lack of facilitation skills (50%) and fear of trainee criticism (42%). Preferred modes for faculty development were DEIAJ integration in conferences (85%), facilitation training (57%), and access to DEIAJ teaching cases (50%). Respondents identified common and important DEIAJ teaching topics that arise in ID clinical practice (Figure 3). Conclusion This single-institution study reveals that ID attendings are comfortable addressing DEIAJ topics in their clinical teaching despite not feeling optimally prepared. Identifying this comfort-preparation gap in our division, as well as preferred faculty development modalities and prioritized DEIAJ topics within ID, is the first step in creating integrated professional development opportunities that capitalize on faculty members’ dedication to DEIAJ teaching. Exploration of this issue on a national scale could support development of a customizable professional development toolkit for the broader ID community. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.