P-2322. Screening Rates and Clinical Outcomes for <i>Hepatitis Delta</i> in Individuals with HBV Coinfection

Abstract Background Hepatitis Delta (HDV) screening is recommended for those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, screening rates are not well documented and are far from ideal. Factors associated with screening for HDV, and clinical outcomes among HBV/HDV coinfected individuals are poorly understood. Our aim was to define the screening rates for HDV among HBV infected individuals, and the incidence of various complications among HBV/HDV coinfected individuals in the US VA healthcare system. Incidence rates for cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma among those with HBV and HBV/HDV coinfection. Methods Within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) national databases, we identified all individuals with HBV (defined as a positive test for HBV surface or “e” antigen, or HBV DNA) between 2002-2023. Screening for HDV was ascertained by serology or HDV PCR testing. Incidence rates for development of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (HD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and death were calculated for those with HBV alone and those with HBV/HDV coinfection. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating progression to cirrhosis, Hepatitis D, and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Results Of the 44,951 individuals with HBV, 5,964 (13.3%) were screened for HDV and 180 (3% of those tested) were positive for HDV. Among 38,472 individuals without baseline cirrhosis, the incidence rates/100 person years (95% CI) for cirrhosis, HD, and HCC were 1.03 (0.52,1.53), 1.79 (1.18,2.4), and 1.91 (1.29,2.52) respectively among those with HBV/HDV coinfection compared with 0.60 (0.58,0.63), 0.72 (0.69,0.74), and 0.49 (0.47,0.51) among those with HBV infection alone. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a higher proportion and accelerated progression to cirrhosis, HD, and HCC among HBV/HDV coinfected compared with HBV monoinfected individuals. Conclusion There are significant gaps in screening for HDV among HBV infected individuals. Those with HBV/HDV coinfection are more likely to develop serious complications compared with those with HBV alone. Disclosures Adeel A. Butt, MD, MS, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2474
Primary Topic
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2322. Screening Rates and Clinical Outcomes for Hepatitis Delta in Individuals with HBV Coinfection

Roger Bedimo, Adeel A. Butt, Peng Yan, Obaid S. Shaikh
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
article

P-2322. Screening Rates and Clinical Outcomes for Hepatitis Delta in Individuals with HBV Coinfection

Roger Bedimo, Adeel A. Butt, Peng Yan, Obaid S. Shaikh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hepatitis Delta (HDV) screening is recommended for those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, screening rates are not well documented and are far from ideal. Factors associated with screening for HDV, and clinical outcomes among HBV/HDV coinfected individuals are poorly understood. Our aim was to define the screening rates for HDV among HBV infected individuals, and the incidence of various complications among HBV/HDV coinfected individuals in the US VA healthcare system. Incidence rates for cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma among those with HBV and HBV/HDV coinfection. Methods Within the Veterans Health Administration (VA) national databases, we identified all individuals with HBV (defined as a positive test for HBV surface or “e” antigen, or HBV DNA) between 2002-2023. Screening for HDV was ascertained by serology or HDV PCR testing. Incidence rates for development of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (HD), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and death were calculated for those with HBV alone and those with HBV/HDV coinfection. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrating progression to cirrhosis, Hepatitis D, and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Results Of the 44,951 individuals with HBV, 5,964 (13.3%) were screened for HDV and 180 (3% of those tested) were positive for HDV. Among 38,472 individuals without baseline cirrhosis, the incidence rates/100 person years (95% CI) for cirrhosis, HD, and HCC were 1.03 (0.52,1.53), 1.79 (1.18,2.4), and 1.91 (1.29,2.52) respectively among those with HBV/HDV coinfection compared with 0.60 (0.58,0.63), 0.72 (0.69,0.74), and 0.49 (0.47,0.51) among those with HBV infection alone. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a higher proportion and accelerated progression to cirrhosis, HD, and HCC among HBV/HDV coinfected compared with HBV monoinfected individuals. Conclusion There are significant gaps in screening for HDV among HBV infected individuals. Those with HBV/HDV coinfection are more likely to develop serious complications compared with those with HBV alone. Disclosures Adeel A. Butt, MD, MS, Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
VA North Texas Health Care System (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.