P-1824. AI-Powered Differential Diagnosis: Distinguishing MIS-C from Kawasaki Disease

Abstract Background Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from COVID-19 (MIS-C) from Kawasaki Disease (KD) can be challenging due to several overlapping clinical presentations. Clinical management of these conditions can vary. Hence, timely and accurate diagnosis is essential. We evaluated the potential of laboratory findings in the differentiation using machine learning (ML) models. Methods Patient demographics (Age, Sex) and laboratory data were compared between MIS-C and KD. Simultaneous CBC and routine biochemistry tests were evaluated. ML models were created using PyTorch, scikit-learn, Pandas, NumPy, and Matplotlib libraries. Specifically, Naive Bayes Classifier, KNN, Logistic Regression, SVC, Random Forest Classifier, XGBoost, GBM and LightGBM models were created and the model performances of the classifiers were evaluated with accuracy percentages. The confusion matrix of every learning model was also generated. K-fold CrossValidation was also performed to evaluate the predictive models. ROC and feature importance analysis were also performed. Identification of the disease as MIS-C or KD based on both regressive (Eg: Total Protein) and binary features (Eg: Sex) is posed as a binary classification ML problem. Train and test datasets were created using a couple of train-test splits (0.2 and 0.25). Results 209 paediatric patients with MIS-C (n=140), and KD (n=69) were included. • The accuracy performances of the models in the test set were determined as 67.8, 73.8, 75.9, 76.8, 79.9, 80.4, 81.0, 81.1%, respectively. • The area under curve (AUC) values of the LightGBM, GBM, XGBoost, were determined as 79.1, 79.5 and 78%, respectively. • Permutation importance analysis of the LightGBM model showed that elevated platelets, neutrophil count, SGPT, WBC levels, Creatinine, and NT ProBNP had influenced the model’s explainability. Conclusion Although four years have passed since the onset of COVID-19, the early diagnosis of MIS-C is still crucial. In addition to clinical findings, laboratory tests may contribute to the fight against the disease by providing early diagnosis of MIS-C and KD. Explainable ML models can help determine the appropriate markers for this purpose. Disclosures Aditya Basu, Bachelor of Technology, Triomics Healthcare: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1987
Primary Topic
Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1824. AI-Powered Differential Diagnosis: Distinguishing MIS-C from Kawasaki Disease

Surupa Basu, A. Basu
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
article

P-1824. AI-Powered Differential Diagnosis: Distinguishing MIS-C from Kawasaki Disease

Surupa Basu, A. Basu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from COVID-19 (MIS-C) from Kawasaki Disease (KD) can be challenging due to several overlapping clinical presentations. Clinical management of these conditions can vary. Hence, timely and accurate diagnosis is essential. We evaluated the potential of laboratory findings in the differentiation using machine learning (ML) models. Methods Patient demographics (Age, Sex) and laboratory data were compared between MIS-C and KD. Simultaneous CBC and routine biochemistry tests were evaluated. ML models were created using PyTorch, scikit-learn, Pandas, NumPy, and Matplotlib libraries. Specifically, Naive Bayes Classifier, KNN, Logistic Regression, SVC, Random Forest Classifier, XGBoost, GBM and LightGBM models were created and the model performances of the classifiers were evaluated with accuracy percentages. The confusion matrix of every learning model was also generated. K-fold CrossValidation was also performed to evaluate the predictive models. ROC and feature importance analysis were also performed. Identification of the disease as MIS-C or KD based on both regressive (Eg: Total Protein) and binary features (Eg: Sex) is posed as a binary classification ML problem. Train and test datasets were created using a couple of train-test splits (0.2 and 0.25). Results 209 paediatric patients with MIS-C (n=140), and KD (n=69) were included. • The accuracy performances of the models in the test set were determined as 67.8, 73.8, 75.9, 76.8, 79.9, 80.4, 81.0, 81.1%, respectively. • The area under curve (AUC) values of the LightGBM, GBM, XGBoost, were determined as 79.1, 79.5 and 78%, respectively. • Permutation importance analysis of the LightGBM model showed that elevated platelets, neutrophil count, SGPT, WBC levels, Creatinine, and NT ProBNP had influenced the model’s explainability. Conclusion Although four years have passed since the onset of COVID-19, the early diagnosis of MIS-C is still crucial. In addition to clinical findings, laboratory tests may contribute to the fight against the disease by providing early diagnosis of MIS-C and KD. Explainable ML models can help determine the appropriate markers for this purpose. Disclosures Aditya Basu, Bachelor of Technology, Triomics Healthcare: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

P-1824. AI-Powered Differential Diagnosis: Distinguishing MIS-C from Kawasaki Disease — Surupa Basu, A. Basu · Open Forum Infectious Diseases (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS