P-439. Breast Cancer (BC) and Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screenings among Persons with HIV (PWH): The Role of Individual and System-Level Factors on Screening Completion

Abstract Background Non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among PWH. With healthcare digitization and evolving HIV care models, equitable access to preventative care is crucial. We investigated individual and system-level factors associated with completion of BC and CRC screenings. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study from 7/1/2022 to 7/1/2023. Established PWH (≥ 3 appointments between 7/1/2020-7/1/2023 with ≥ 1 within the study period) aged 40-75 were included. The primary outcome was ordering and completion of BC and CRC screenings. Demographics were summarized using frequency and percentage for groups with differing screening statuses. Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test were used to evaluate associations between factors and outcomes. Descriptive statistics and p values were considered for evaluating associations between characteristics and screening status. Results 178 PWH eligible for BC screening were included. 113 (63.5%) were of Black/African American race, 151 (84.8%) had a primary care physician (PCP), and 138 (77.5%) were enrolled in an electronic medical record application (MyChart®). 52.7% were up to date on BC screening. Demographics and BC screening statuses are listed in Table 1. We observed a statistically significant association between having a PCP (90.2% vs 75.8%; p=0.018) and ordering of BC screening. Moreover, patients who completed BC screening are less likely to have obesity (39.4% vs 56.0%; p=0.039) (Table 2). 739 PWH eligible for CRC screening were included. 591 (80%) were assigned male sex at birth, 634 (85.8%) had a PCP, and 601 (81.3%) were enrolled in MyChart®. 349 (47.2%) were up to date on CRC screening. Demographics and CRC screening statuses are listed in Table 3. Significant associations were noted between having a PCP (90.8% vs 81.3%; p < 0.001), higher median income (79.6% vs 69.9%; p=0.003), and MyChart® enrollment (88.0% vs 75.4%; p < 0.001) and CRC screening completion. Other notable variables are listed in Table 4. Conclusion BC and CRC screening is essential in reducing morbidity, mortality, and disparities of BC and CRC among PWH. Our findings provide insight on target populations for interventions and highlight opportunities to utilize digital technologies to improve cancer screening rates. Disclosures Carlos Malvestutto, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv Healhcare: Advisor/Consultant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.639
Primary Topic
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-439. Breast Cancer (BC) and Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screenings among Persons with HIV (PWH): The Role of Individual and System-Level Factors on Screening Completion

Susan L. Koletar, Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie, Yesha Patel, Carlos Malvestutto et al.
1 links
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
article

P-439. Breast Cancer (BC) and Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screenings among Persons with HIV (PWH): The Role of Individual and System-Level Factors on Screening Completion

Susan L. Koletar, Mohammad Mahdee Sobhanie, Yesha Patel, Carlos Malvestutto, Ashley Lipps, Cole T. Bredehoeft, Jing Peng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-AIDS-defining cancers (NADCs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among PWH. With healthcare digitization and evolving HIV care models, equitable access to preventative care is crucial. We investigated individual and system-level factors associated with completion of BC and CRC screenings. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study from 7/1/2022 to 7/1/2023. Established PWH (≥ 3 appointments between 7/1/2020-7/1/2023 with ≥ 1 within the study period) aged 40-75 were included. The primary outcome was ordering and completion of BC and CRC screenings. Demographics were summarized using frequency and percentage for groups with differing screening statuses. Chi-Square or Fisher’s exact test were used to evaluate associations between factors and outcomes. Descriptive statistics and p values were considered for evaluating associations between characteristics and screening status. Results 178 PWH eligible for BC screening were included. 113 (63.5%) were of Black/African American race, 151 (84.8%) had a primary care physician (PCP), and 138 (77.5%) were enrolled in an electronic medical record application (MyChart®). 52.7% were up to date on BC screening. Demographics and BC screening statuses are listed in Table 1. We observed a statistically significant association between having a PCP (90.2% vs 75.8%; p=0.018) and ordering of BC screening. Moreover, patients who completed BC screening are less likely to have obesity (39.4% vs 56.0%; p=0.039) (Table 2). 739 PWH eligible for CRC screening were included. 591 (80%) were assigned male sex at birth, 634 (85.8%) had a PCP, and 601 (81.3%) were enrolled in MyChart®. 349 (47.2%) were up to date on CRC screening. Demographics and CRC screening statuses are listed in Table 3. Significant associations were noted between having a PCP (90.8% vs 81.3%; p < 0.001), higher median income (79.6% vs 69.9%; p=0.003), and MyChart® enrollment (88.0% vs 75.4%; p < 0.001) and CRC screening completion. Other notable variables are listed in Table 4. Conclusion BC and CRC screening is essential in reducing morbidity, mortality, and disparities of BC and CRC among PWH. Our findings provide insight on target populations for interventions and highlight opportunities to utilize digital technologies to improve cancer screening rates. Disclosures Carlos Malvestutto, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Viiv Healhcare: Advisor/Consultant

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Viral-associated cancers and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.