P-300. Antimicrobial Resistance Focus in French ICU: A national surveillance network analysis on <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> nosocomial infections

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive description on a cohort of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected patients in ICU, comparing their characteristics between susceptible and resistant strains, to understand the impact of resistance on clinical decisions and to characterize patients at risk of MDR. Site of infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Methods Adult patients hospitalized in France for at least 48 hours in ICU participating to REA-REZO surveillance between 2018 and 2021 were included in the data base used to create this cohort. Resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Results 4196 patients with nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections were included in this cohort. Most infections were identified in patients with pneumonia, with a consistently high prevalence ranging from 71.5% to 74.5% depending on the year. Among the Pseudomonas, 1734 (31.0%) were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, 1331 (23.8%) were resistant to ceftazidime, and 1191 (21.3%) were carbapenem resistant. A statistically significant difference (p&amp;lt; 0.001) in resistance patterns between the first and subsequent infections is seen, notably for resistance to carbapenems which rose markedly from initial to subsequent infections, from 16.3% to 27.8% (p&amp;lt; 0.001). Regarding occurrence of resistant Pseudomonas strains, statistically significant differences in age distribution among the resistance groups are noted (p&amp;lt; 0.001), particularly evident in patients under 55, where 24.0% of those with dual resistance are under this age threshold, compared to 19.7% with no resistance. The SAPS II score was higher among resistant strains, as well as the duration in ICU stay, suggesting more challenging infections. Description of the patient with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections Conclusion These results reaffirm the critical challenge posed by resistant Pseudomonas in the ICU. It highlights the need for comprehensive antibiotic strategies that address the clinical, psychological, and economic dimensions of this issue. Disclosures Xavier Bourge, PharmD, MSD France: Employee Arnaud Friggeri, MD, MSD France: Advisor/Consultant Alain Lepape, MD, MSD France: Grant/Research Support Claire Prevot, n/a, MSD France: Employee Anais Machut, n/a, MSD France: Grant/Research Support Charles-Hervé Vacheron, MD, MSD France: Grant/Research Support

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.503
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-300. Antimicrobial Resistance Focus in French ICU: A national surveillance network analysis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial infections

Xavier Bourge, Arnaud Friggeri, Anaïs Machut, Alain Lepape et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-300. Antimicrobial Resistance Focus in French ICU: A national surveillance network analysis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial infections

Xavier Bourge, Arnaud Friggeri, Anaïs Machut, Alain Lepape, Charles‐Hervé Vacheron, Claire Prevot
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to perform a comprehensive description on a cohort of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected patients in ICU, comparing their characteristics between susceptible and resistant strains, to understand the impact of resistance on clinical decisions and to characterize patients at risk of MDR. Site of infection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Methods Adult patients hospitalized in France for at least 48 hours in ICU participating to REA-REZO surveillance between 2018 and 2021 were included in the data base used to create this cohort. Resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Results 4196 patients with nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections were included in this cohort. Most infections were identified in patients with pneumonia, with a consistently high prevalence ranging from 71.5% to 74.5% depending on the year. Among the Pseudomonas, 1734 (31.0%) were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, 1331 (23.8%) were resistant to ceftazidime, and 1191 (21.3%) were carbapenem resistant. A statistically significant difference (p&amp;lt; 0.001) in resistance patterns between the first and subsequent infections is seen, notably for resistance to carbapenems which rose markedly from initial to subsequent infections, from 16.3% to 27.8% (p&amp;lt; 0.001). Regarding occurrence of resistant Pseudomonas strains, statistically significant differences in age distribution among the resistance groups are noted (p&amp;lt; 0.001), particularly evident in patients under 55, where 24.0% of those with dual resistance are under this age threshold, compared to 19.7% with no resistance. The SAPS II score was higher among resistant strains, as well as the duration in ICU stay, suggesting more challenging infections. Description of the patient with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections Conclusion These results reaffirm the critical challenge posed by resistant Pseudomonas in the ICU. It highlights the need for comprehensive antibiotic strategies that address the clinical, psychological, and economic dimensions of this issue. Disclosures Xavier Bourge, PharmD, MSD France: Employee Arnaud Friggeri, MD, MSD France: Advisor/Consultant Alain Lepape, MD, MSD France: Grant/Research Support Claire Prevot, n/a, MSD France: Employee Anais Machut, n/a, MSD France: Grant/Research Support Charles-Hervé Vacheron, MD, MSD France: Grant/Research Support

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
MSD (France) (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Hôpital Lyon Sud (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.