P-965. Using Simulated Corrective Mentoring to Improve Clinical Decision-Making for Patients with HIV and Identify Drivers for Treatment Choices

Abstract Background Due to the vast number of treatment options for the management of patients with HIV, providers are challenged to optimally individualize treatment based on comorbidities, viral resistance, and patient preferences. The use of corrective mentoring in continuing education (CE), is a proven method to improve clinical decision-making while identifying persisting practice challenges. Methods Vindico Medical Education and Syandus developed four virtual clinical scenarios designed to encourage optimal decision-making for patients with HIV by providing immediate feedback via simulated corrective mentoring. Results As of April 2024, 220 physicians or advanced practice providers involved in the management of patients with HIV had participated in the simulations. Across simulations, only 27% of initial decisions were optimal. At baseline, the most challenging topics regarding medication management were related to management during pregnancy (33% optimal), initial ART selection (49% optimal), and identifying candidates for injectable therapy (44% optimal). However, after corrective mentoring, there was over a 300% increase in optimal decisions made. Of optimal decisions, 48% of clinicians preferred BIC/FTC/TAF as initial treatment selection for a young male with no comorbidities and 47% preferred this regimen for an older patient with early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and various other cardiovascular comorbidities. However, for a patient who is pregnant, BIC/FTC/TAF was also the preferred regimen, even though at the time of the simulation development there was insufficient data to recommend its use. These findings suggest that comfortability with certain regimens may be a driving force for clinical decision-making, even when those decisions may not be ideal. Drivers of choosing alternatives such as CAB/RPV or DTC/3TC include avoidance of weight gain, reduced pill burden, and later stage CKD. Conclusion The use of corrective mentoring in simulation-based CE is an impactful way to encourage clinical decision-making aligned with the latest evidence. Moreover, these data highlight the need to educate clinicians who manage patients with HIV on the importance of individualizing treatment based on patient characteristics. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1155
Primary Topic
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-965. Using Simulated Corrective Mentoring to Improve Clinical Decision-Making for Patients with HIV and Identify Drivers for Treatment Choices

Katie Robinson, Jennifer Frederick, Robert A. Esgro, B M Hegde et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
article

P-965. Using Simulated Corrective Mentoring to Improve Clinical Decision-Making for Patients with HIV and Identify Drivers for Treatment Choices

Katie Robinson, Jennifer Frederick, Robert A. Esgro, B M Hegde, Jennifer Surich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Due to the vast number of treatment options for the management of patients with HIV, providers are challenged to optimally individualize treatment based on comorbidities, viral resistance, and patient preferences. The use of corrective mentoring in continuing education (CE), is a proven method to improve clinical decision-making while identifying persisting practice challenges. Methods Vindico Medical Education and Syandus developed four virtual clinical scenarios designed to encourage optimal decision-making for patients with HIV by providing immediate feedback via simulated corrective mentoring. Results As of April 2024, 220 physicians or advanced practice providers involved in the management of patients with HIV had participated in the simulations. Across simulations, only 27% of initial decisions were optimal. At baseline, the most challenging topics regarding medication management were related to management during pregnancy (33% optimal), initial ART selection (49% optimal), and identifying candidates for injectable therapy (44% optimal). However, after corrective mentoring, there was over a 300% increase in optimal decisions made. Of optimal decisions, 48% of clinicians preferred BIC/FTC/TAF as initial treatment selection for a young male with no comorbidities and 47% preferred this regimen for an older patient with early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) and various other cardiovascular comorbidities. However, for a patient who is pregnant, BIC/FTC/TAF was also the preferred regimen, even though at the time of the simulation development there was insufficient data to recommend its use. These findings suggest that comfortability with certain regimens may be a driving force for clinical decision-making, even when those decisions may not be ideal. Drivers of choosing alternatives such as CAB/RPV or DTC/3TC include avoidance of weight gain, reduced pill burden, and later stage CKD. Conclusion The use of corrective mentoring in simulation-based CE is an impactful way to encourage clinical decision-making aligned with the latest evidence. Moreover, these data highlight the need to educate clinicians who manage patients with HIV on the importance of individualizing treatment based on patient characteristics. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
AtlantiCare (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.