P-1645. Appropriateness of Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescriptions Given Outside of Formal Patient-Clinician Encounters
Abstract Background There are limited published data on the frequency and appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions ordered outside of formal patient-clinician encounters. Methods A random sample of oral antibiotics prescribed to adult patients from 4 primary care practices were manually reviewed for appropriateness. The need for any antibiotic, as well as the appropriateness of agent selection and duration, were compared between visit-based (formal in-person, video, or telephone encounters) and non-visit-based encounters. Results Of the 859 prescriptions reviewed, 543 (63.2%) were generated from visit-based encounters (48.2%, 13.2% and 1.9% were from in-person, video, and telephone visits, respectively) and 316 (36.8%) were non-visit-based. Overall, 29.7% of prescriptions were written despite no antibiotic indication (Table). Antibiotics were indicated in 382/543 (70.3%) of visit-based encounters, vs 165/316 (52.2%) of non-visit-based encounters (P< 0.0001). When an antibiotic was indicated, agent selection was more frequently appropriate in visit-based encounters (88.7% vs 81.8%, P=0.006), with no difference in appropriate duration (81.9% vs 89.7%, P=0.49). When duration was inappropriate, it was too long in 94.5% of cases. Among visit-based prescribing, antibiotic prescriptions were indicated more frequently from in-person encounters as compared to virtual (combined video and telephone) encounters (73.4% vs 60.5%, P=0.008). Compared to visit-based antibiotic prescriptions, significantly fewer non-visit-based antibiotic prescriptions were associated with any diagnosis code (543/543 (100%) vs 189/316 (59.8%), P< 0.0001). Azithromycin and fluoroquinolones were more likely to be inappropriately chosen agents compared to other antibiotics (46.7% vs 12.4%, P< 0.0001, and 45.5% vs 12.4%, P< 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion Compared to antibiotic prescriptions from formal patient-clinician encounters, antibiotic prescriptions generated from non-visit-based encounters were significantly less indicated, with less appropriate agent selection, and were frequently not associated with a diagnosis code. Outpatient stewardship efforts should target non-visit-based encounters. Disclosures Dustin R. Carr, PharmD, BCPS, BCIDP, Merck: Advisor/Consultant Derek N. Bremmer, PharmD, BCIDP, Thermo Fischer Scientific: Expert Testimony
Authors
- Edmund Appiah‐Kubi
- George Bchech
- Dustin R Carr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8543-4972)
- Matthew A Moffa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-7490)
- Thomas Walsh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-7776)
- Derek N. Bremmer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-5345)
- Carley Buchanan
- Nathan R Shively (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6163-438X)
- Sophia Barber
- Tamara L. Trienski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5674-6480)
- Jerod Nagel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-1471)
- Shenjun Zhu
- Ryan Rothman
- Vivian Kalu
Institutions
- Allegheny Health Network (US)
- Allegheny General Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Open Forum Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2025-01-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1811
- Primary Topic
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00