P-1646. Assessing Antibiotic Adverse Drug Events from Walk-In Clinics at an Academic Healthcare System

Abstract Background Outpatient antibiotic adverse drug event (ADE) rates are largely unknown. This project aimed to evaluate methods for collecting data on antibiotic ADEs and report antibiotic ADE data from 8 walk-in clinics (WICs) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), which represents a high-volume antibiotic prescribing outpatient setting. Methods We attempted retrospective data collection of antibiotic ADE billing codes. After multiple trials, we recognized a need to understand how ADEs are documented (Tables 1 and 2) versus billed. To examine this, we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients prescribed antibiotics in selected WICs from 8/1/23 - 10/31/23 with WIC, primary care, or emergency department visits within 14 days after. We reviewed visit notes for antibiotic ADEs. If present, visit billing codes were collected and analyzed. To evaluate potential new antibiotic ADE data collection methods, especially ADEs reported via calls without a visit, we conducted prospective collection of antibiotic ADE calls or return visits within 14 days from patients prescribed antibiotics at selected WICs from 11/1/23-4/30/24 via voluntary REDCap survey reports by WIC providers. We used manual chart review to assess antibiotic appropriateness. Results From 8/1/23-10/31/23, we extracted 1059 unique visits with antibiotic prescriptions; 69 (6.5%) had antibiotic ADEs documented in subsequent visits. ADEs were secondary complaints in 30/69 (43.5%) visits. ADE billing codes were present in 17/69 (24.6%) visits (Figure 1). From 11/1/2023-4/30/2024, 16,274 WIC visits had antibiotic prescriptions. Providers logged 45 calls and 3 return visits (48/16274, 0.3%); 6/48 (12.5%) antibiotics were unnecessary. When antibiotics were indicated, choice, dose, or duration was inappropriate in 13/42 (31.0%).Table 2:ICD-10 codes classified by organ system Conclusion This project showed outpatient antibiotic ADEs occur routinely. Utilizing voluntary reporting led to increased capture of antibiotic ADE patient calls but was not comprehensive. Additionally, ADE billing codes are currently underutilized, resulting in inaccurate estimates of antibiotic ADEs. Future studies are needed to determine an optimal approach to identify and extract antibiotic ADE data from electronic medical records. Disclosures Milner Staub, MD, MPH, Gilead: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Johnson & Johnson: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1812
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1646. Assessing Antibiotic Adverse Drug Events from Walk-In Clinics at an Academic Healthcare System

Ronnie Thomas, Sharon Onguti, Claude E. Shackelford, Junfeng Jim Zhang et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

P-1646. Assessing Antibiotic Adverse Drug Events from Walk-In Clinics at an Academic Healthcare System

Ronnie Thomas, Sharon Onguti, Claude E. Shackelford, Junfeng Jim Zhang, Milner Staub, Nishant Patel, Michael Zou, Emily W Nardone, Angela Zuill
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Outpatient antibiotic adverse drug event (ADE) rates are largely unknown. This project aimed to evaluate methods for collecting data on antibiotic ADEs and report antibiotic ADE data from 8 walk-in clinics (WICs) at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), which represents a high-volume antibiotic prescribing outpatient setting. Methods We attempted retrospective data collection of antibiotic ADE billing codes. After multiple trials, we recognized a need to understand how ADEs are documented (Tables 1 and 2) versus billed. To examine this, we conducted a retrospective chart review of patients prescribed antibiotics in selected WICs from 8/1/23 - 10/31/23 with WIC, primary care, or emergency department visits within 14 days after. We reviewed visit notes for antibiotic ADEs. If present, visit billing codes were collected and analyzed. To evaluate potential new antibiotic ADE data collection methods, especially ADEs reported via calls without a visit, we conducted prospective collection of antibiotic ADE calls or return visits within 14 days from patients prescribed antibiotics at selected WICs from 11/1/23-4/30/24 via voluntary REDCap survey reports by WIC providers. We used manual chart review to assess antibiotic appropriateness. Results From 8/1/23-10/31/23, we extracted 1059 unique visits with antibiotic prescriptions; 69 (6.5%) had antibiotic ADEs documented in subsequent visits. ADEs were secondary complaints in 30/69 (43.5%) visits. ADE billing codes were present in 17/69 (24.6%) visits (Figure 1). From 11/1/2023-4/30/2024, 16,274 WIC visits had antibiotic prescriptions. Providers logged 45 calls and 3 return visits (48/16274, 0.3%); 6/48 (12.5%) antibiotics were unnecessary. When antibiotics were indicated, choice, dose, or duration was inappropriate in 13/42 (31.0%).Table 2:ICD-10 codes classified by organ system Conclusion This project showed outpatient antibiotic ADEs occur routinely. Utilizing voluntary reporting led to increased capture of antibiotic ADE patient calls but was not comprehensive. Additionally, ADE billing codes are currently underutilized, resulting in inaccurate estimates of antibiotic ADEs. Future studies are needed to determine an optimal approach to identify and extract antibiotic ADE data from electronic medical records. Disclosures Milner Staub, MD, MPH, Gilead: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Johnson & Johnson: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
University of Louisville (US), Vanderbilt University (US), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.