P-1482. Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Treating Bacteremic and Non-Bacteremic Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CA) and CA plus aztreonam (ATM) are the preferred treatment options for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales infections (KPC-CPE and MBL-CPE), respectively. There are not many studies in immunocompromised patients (IP). Methods Observational and prospective cohort study. All episodes of KPC-CPE and MBL-CPE infections in IP admitted to a university hospital from August 2018 to April 2023, who received definitive antibiotic therapy (DAT) with CA or CA+ATM for at least 48 hours, were included. Non-bacteremic episodes (NBE) were compared with those with bacteremia (BE). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 30-day mortality (RFM). Results Seventy-six episodes were included (36 NBE and 40 BE). Hematological malignancies and neutropenia were more frequent in BE (NBE 13.9% vs. BE 50.2%, p< 0.001; and NBE 5.6% vs. BE 42.5%, p< 0.001), while solid organ transplantation was in NBE (NBE 66.7% vs. BE 32.5%, p=0.003). The urinary source was more frequent in NBE (NBE 72.2% vs. BE 30%, p< 0.001), while the abdominal source was in BE (NBE 2.8% vs. BE 17.5%, p=0.04). K. pneumoniae was the main isolated microorganism, and KPC-CPE was the most common resistance mechanism in both groups, followed by MBL-CPE, without significant differences. Septic shock at onset was higher in BE (NBE 8.3% vs. BE 30%, p=0.18). Empirical treatment was appropriate in 59.3% of NBE vs. 75% of BE, p=0.12. Seven-day mortality, 30-day overall and infection-related mortality in NBE and BE were 2.8% vs. 5%, p=0.40; 11.1% vs. 27.5%, p=0.07; and 0% vs. 10%, p=0.07; respectively. The RFM were APACHE II score >20 [OR 5.80 (95% CI 1.19-28.17)], and acute renal failure [OR 16.15 (95% CI 1.78-146)]. Conclusion KPC-CPE and MBL-CPE infections in IP with or without bacteremia who received DAT with CA or CA+ATM had low early and 30-day infection-related mortality. RFM were related to the severity and complications of the infections. Disclosures Diego Torres, Medical Doctor, Gador: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Khight Therapeutics: Honoraria|MSD: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1652
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1482. Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Treating Bacteremic and Non-Bacteremic Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

Pablo Bonvehí, Marcia Querci, Silvia Relloso, Jimena Carlos et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
article

P-1482. Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Treating Bacteremic and Non-Bacteremic Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Infections in Immunocompromised Patients

Pablo Bonvehí, Marcia Querci, Silvia Relloso, Jimena Carlos, Jorgelina Smayevsky, Elena Temporiti, A.N. Rearte, Diego Torres, Fabián Herrera, Federico Nicola, María Victoria Leone, Rocío Sáenz-Díez Rojas, Florencia Bues
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CA) and CA plus aztreonam (ATM) are the preferred treatment options for KPC and metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL) carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales infections (KPC-CPE and MBL-CPE), respectively. There are not many studies in immunocompromised patients (IP). Methods Observational and prospective cohort study. All episodes of KPC-CPE and MBL-CPE infections in IP admitted to a university hospital from August 2018 to April 2023, who received definitive antibiotic therapy (DAT) with CA or CA+ATM for at least 48 hours, were included. Non-bacteremic episodes (NBE) were compared with those with bacteremia (BE). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 30-day mortality (RFM). Results Seventy-six episodes were included (36 NBE and 40 BE). Hematological malignancies and neutropenia were more frequent in BE (NBE 13.9% vs. BE 50.2%, p< 0.001; and NBE 5.6% vs. BE 42.5%, p< 0.001), while solid organ transplantation was in NBE (NBE 66.7% vs. BE 32.5%, p=0.003). The urinary source was more frequent in NBE (NBE 72.2% vs. BE 30%, p< 0.001), while the abdominal source was in BE (NBE 2.8% vs. BE 17.5%, p=0.04). K. pneumoniae was the main isolated microorganism, and KPC-CPE was the most common resistance mechanism in both groups, followed by MBL-CPE, without significant differences. Septic shock at onset was higher in BE (NBE 8.3% vs. BE 30%, p=0.18). Empirical treatment was appropriate in 59.3% of NBE vs. 75% of BE, p=0.12. Seven-day mortality, 30-day overall and infection-related mortality in NBE and BE were 2.8% vs. 5%, p=0.40; 11.1% vs. 27.5%, p=0.07; and 0% vs. 10%, p=0.07; respectively. The RFM were APACHE II score >20 [OR 5.80 (95% CI 1.19-28.17)], and acute renal failure [OR 16.15 (95% CI 1.78-146)]. Conclusion KPC-CPE and MBL-CPE infections in IP with or without bacteremia who received DAT with CA or CA+ATM had low early and 30-day infection-related mortality. RFM were related to the severity and complications of the infections. Disclosures Diego Torres, Medical Doctor, Gador: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Khight Therapeutics: Honoraria|MSD: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.