High-quality, low-quantity: A data-centric approach to deep learning performance optimization in digital X-Ray radiography

The accuracy of identifying defects using specialized deep learning models can be affected by the circumstances in which the training data is curated. This is especially evident in digital X-ray radiography, where the depiction of flaws is significantly impacted by the exposure conditions. This study examines the effect of curating high-quality data on deep learning models. The variation in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), which is a crucial metric of image quality between features of interest and an adjacent normal background, has been found to be a key factor in model generalization in digital X-ray radiography applications. By making systematic alterations to exposure conditions during data curation, it was possible to obtain several representations of flaws in each test component with varying contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) in the resultant radiographs. To evaluate the efficacy of the model under various conditions, two distinct datasets were curated. Dataset 1 was obtained by acquiring images with a consistent exposure setting on 140 test samples. The samples contained 4 morphologically distinct classes of flat bottom holes with seven different depths and sizes. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) representations of flaws in this dataset can be attributed only to differences in depth in Dataset 1. Additionally, Dataset 2 was curated with an expanded range of CNR values by methodically adjusting exposure settings during image acquisitions. Hence, only 42 % of the test pieces from Dataset 1, which had three distinct depths of flat bottom holes, were used. Each of the two datasets was used to separately train YOLOv8 for instance segmentation and U-net for multi-class semantic segmentation. Each model was trained under the same conditions, and their performances were assessed using test sets from both dataset groups. The model trained on Dataset 1 exhibited a notable decline in performance when evaluated on test sets from Dataset 2, suggesting a lack of generalization ability. Conversely, the model that was trained using Dataset 2 consistently achieved high accuracy on both test sets, demonstrating impressive performance and successful generalization. This work shows that the generalization abilities of deep learning models may be improved by varying the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of features in the training data. This finding paves the way for practical applications in digital X-ray radiography.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NDT & E International
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103327
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-quality, low-quantity: A data-centric approach to deep learning performance optimization in digital X-Ray radiography

Xavier Maldague, Bata Hena, Clemente Ibarra‐Castanedo, Ziang Wei
3 citations
NDT & E International
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
4.08
article

High-quality, low-quantity: A data-centric approach to deep learning performance optimization in digital X-Ray radiography

Xavier Maldague, Bata Hena, Clemente Ibarra‐Castanedo, Ziang Wei
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The accuracy of identifying defects using specialized deep learning models can be affected by the circumstances in which the training data is curated. This is especially evident in digital X-ray radiography, where the depiction of flaws is significantly impacted by the exposure conditions. This study examines the effect of curating high-quality data on deep learning models. The variation in contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), which is a crucial metric of image quality between features of interest and an adjacent normal background, has been found to be a key factor in model generalization in digital X-ray radiography applications. By making systematic alterations to exposure conditions during data curation, it was possible to obtain several representations of flaws in each test component with varying contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) in the resultant radiographs. To evaluate the efficacy of the model under various conditions, two distinct datasets were curated. Dataset 1 was obtained by acquiring images with a consistent exposure setting on 140 test samples. The samples contained 4 morphologically distinct classes of flat bottom holes with seven different depths and sizes. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) representations of flaws in this dataset can be attributed only to differences in depth in Dataset 1. Additionally, Dataset 2 was curated with an expanded range of CNR values by methodically adjusting exposure settings during image acquisitions. Hence, only 42 % of the test pieces from Dataset 1, which had three distinct depths of flat bottom holes, were used. Each of the two datasets was used to separately train YOLOv8 for instance segmentation and U-net for multi-class semantic segmentation. Each model was trained under the same conditions, and their performances were assessed using test sets from both dataset groups. The model trained on Dataset 1 exhibited a notable decline in performance when evaluated on test sets from Dataset 2, suggesting a lack of generalization ability. Conversely, the model that was trained using Dataset 2 consistently achieved high accuracy on both test sets, demonstrating impressive performance and successful generalization. This work shows that the generalization abilities of deep learning models may be improved by varying the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of features in the training data. This finding paves the way for practical applications in digital X-ray radiography.

NDT & E InternationalVol. 152
Université Laval (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.