P-1237. Comparison of Non-trapezoidal and Trapezoidal Pharmacokinetic Equations to Calculate Vancomycin Area Under the Curve within 24 Hours of Therapy in Patients with Persistent Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia

Abstract Background Achieving target vancomycin (VAN) area under the curve within 24 hours of therapy (AUC0-24) is associated with better clinical outcomes for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Two first-order pharmacokinetic (PK) equations, e.g. the trapezoidal and non-trapezoidal methods, can be used to estimate AUC. The 2020 vancomycin monitoring guidelines do not address which PK equation to estimate AUC0-24. Furthermore, there is limited data directly comparing these methods on day 1 of therapy, especially in patients with confirmed MRSA infection. This study aims to compare the calculated VAN AUC0-24 using the two PK equations in patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia. Then, compare the first-order PK computed values to a Bayesian-calculated AUC0-24. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) for ≥ 3 days between December 1st 2020, to December 31st 2023. Patients treated with intravenous vancomycin for ≥ 48 hours and had two consecutive serum VAN concentrations collected within 48 hours of therapy were screened for study inclusion. AUC0-24 was calculated using first-order PK equations (e.g. non-trapezoidal, trapezoidal), and Bayesian software (DoseMeRx). Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) was used to assess correlations between linear PK equations and Bayesian software. Results A total of 79 patients with MRSAB were screened, 12 of whom had a persistent MRSAB. The median duration of bacteremia was 7 days (4, 11). The median AUC0-24 estimated by non-trapezoidal and trapezoidal methods were 605 mg*h/l (IQR 403, 484) and 453 mg*h/L (IQR 356, 707), respectively. A stronger correlation was observed between AUC0-24 estimated by the non-trapezoidal method and Bayesian (rs = 0.82; P 0.001), compared to the trapezoidal method and Bayesian (rs = 0.61; P 0.035). Conclusion Both first-order PK equations correlated with Bayesian-estimated AUC0-24, with a stronger trend towards non-trapezoidal method. Further research is needed to corroborate this finding. Disclosures Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir, PharmD, MPH, CSL Sequiris: Advisor/Consultant|CSL Sequiris: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1419
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1237. Comparison of Non-trapezoidal and Trapezoidal Pharmacokinetic Equations to Calculate Vancomycin Area Under the Curve within 24 Hours of Therapy in Patients with Persistent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Abdulwhab Shremo Msdi, Karen K. Tan, Jacinda C. Abdul‐Mutakabbir
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

P-1237. Comparison of Non-trapezoidal and Trapezoidal Pharmacokinetic Equations to Calculate Vancomycin Area Under the Curve within 24 Hours of Therapy in Patients with Persistent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Abdulwhab Shremo Msdi, Karen K. Tan, Jacinda C. Abdul‐Mutakabbir
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Achieving target vancomycin (VAN) area under the curve within 24 hours of therapy (AUC0-24) is associated with better clinical outcomes for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Two first-order pharmacokinetic (PK) equations, e.g. the trapezoidal and non-trapezoidal methods, can be used to estimate AUC. The 2020 vancomycin monitoring guidelines do not address which PK equation to estimate AUC0-24. Furthermore, there is limited data directly comparing these methods on day 1 of therapy, especially in patients with confirmed MRSA infection. This study aims to compare the calculated VAN AUC0-24 using the two PK equations in patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia. Then, compare the first-order PK computed values to a Bayesian-calculated AUC0-24. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with persistent MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) for ≥ 3 days between December 1st 2020, to December 31st 2023. Patients treated with intravenous vancomycin for ≥ 48 hours and had two consecutive serum VAN concentrations collected within 48 hours of therapy were screened for study inclusion. AUC0-24 was calculated using first-order PK equations (e.g. non-trapezoidal, trapezoidal), and Bayesian software (DoseMeRx). Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) was used to assess correlations between linear PK equations and Bayesian software. Results A total of 79 patients with MRSAB were screened, 12 of whom had a persistent MRSAB. The median duration of bacteremia was 7 days (4, 11). The median AUC0-24 estimated by non-trapezoidal and trapezoidal methods were 605 mg*h/l (IQR 403, 484) and 453 mg*h/L (IQR 356, 707), respectively. A stronger correlation was observed between AUC0-24 estimated by the non-trapezoidal method and Bayesian (rs = 0.82; P 0.001), compared to the trapezoidal method and Bayesian (rs = 0.61; P 0.035). Conclusion Both first-order PK equations correlated with Bayesian-estimated AUC0-24, with a stronger trend towards non-trapezoidal method. Further research is needed to corroborate this finding. Disclosures Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir, PharmD, MPH, CSL Sequiris: Advisor/Consultant|CSL Sequiris: Honoraria|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Honoraria|Shionogi: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Honoraria

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Loma Linda University Medical Center (US), Loma Linda University (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.