P-1795. Antimicrobial Stewardship Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Among Health Care Providers in a Community Hospital Network

Abstract Background Drivers of inappropriate antimicrobial use (AU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) can be linked to deficiencies in prescribers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding antibiotics. Currently, KAP information in community hospitals throughout the United States (US) is not well known, and survey information is not standardized. Understanding clinicians’ KAP regarding AU and AMR may provide valuable information for improving antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts.Figure 1 Methods Prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, and administrators at 40 community hospitals within the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON) were invited to take an anonymous, voluntary, 41-question web-based IRB-approved AS KAP survey. This survey is an internationally validated tool translated for use in the US (www.oucru.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/KAP_tool.pdf). Responses were collected via REDCap from Feb – Apr 2024.Figure 2 Results A total of 167 survey responses were received from 24 hospitals; 77 (46%) were pharmacists, 62 (37%) were nurses, and 16 (10%) were physicians. Respondents had a median of 15 years (15.3) of experience in their current healthcare profession and 8.5 years (14.3) in their current institution. Most respondents were familiar with AS (74.3%), strongly agree that antimicrobial overuse can cause harm (79.6%), and that appropriate antibiotic use can reduce AMR (74.3%) (Fig 1). More than half of the respondents who prescribe antibiotics agreed that education and feedback via peer comparison or direct feedback would improve their prescribing (Fig 2). Prescribing respondents also agreed that AS teams impact their antibiotic decisions (87.5%). 63% of prescribers and 46% of non-prescribers agreed antibiotics are overused at their institution. Providers were the most likely to agree AMR is a problem at their institutions (Fig 3).Figure 3 Conclusion Healthcare workers within DASON were aware of the importance of AS and its effect on AMR and patient outcomes. Prescriber feedback was seen as a valuable educational tool, as most prescribers valued AS feedback and agreed feedback would improve antibiotic selection. Disclosures Melissa D. Johnson, PharmD MHS AAHIVP, Biomeme: Licensed Technology|Scynexis, Inc: Grant/Research Support|UpToDate: Author Royalties Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, PharmD, MHS, HealthtrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Royalties

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.1958
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-1795. Antimicrobial Stewardship Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Among Health Care Providers in a Community Hospital Network

Deverick J. Anderson, Melissa D. Johnson, Angelina Davis, April Dyer et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

P-1795. Antimicrobial Stewardship Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) Among Health Care Providers in a Community Hospital Network

Deverick J. Anderson, Melissa D. Johnson, Angelina Davis, April Dyer, Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, Jeannette Bouchard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Drivers of inappropriate antimicrobial use (AU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) can be linked to deficiencies in prescribers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding antibiotics. Currently, KAP information in community hospitals throughout the United States (US) is not well known, and survey information is not standardized. Understanding clinicians’ KAP regarding AU and AMR may provide valuable information for improving antimicrobial stewardship (AS) efforts.Figure 1 Methods Prescribers, pharmacists, nurses, and administrators at 40 community hospitals within the Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON) were invited to take an anonymous, voluntary, 41-question web-based IRB-approved AS KAP survey. This survey is an internationally validated tool translated for use in the US (www.oucru.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/KAP_tool.pdf). Responses were collected via REDCap from Feb – Apr 2024.Figure 2 Results A total of 167 survey responses were received from 24 hospitals; 77 (46%) were pharmacists, 62 (37%) were nurses, and 16 (10%) were physicians. Respondents had a median of 15 years (15.3) of experience in their current healthcare profession and 8.5 years (14.3) in their current institution. Most respondents were familiar with AS (74.3%), strongly agree that antimicrobial overuse can cause harm (79.6%), and that appropriate antibiotic use can reduce AMR (74.3%) (Fig 1). More than half of the respondents who prescribe antibiotics agreed that education and feedback via peer comparison or direct feedback would improve their prescribing (Fig 2). Prescribing respondents also agreed that AS teams impact their antibiotic decisions (87.5%). 63% of prescribers and 46% of non-prescribers agreed antibiotics are overused at their institution. Providers were the most likely to agree AMR is a problem at their institutions (Fig 3).Figure 3 Conclusion Healthcare workers within DASON were aware of the importance of AS and its effect on AMR and patient outcomes. Prescriber feedback was seen as a valuable educational tool, as most prescribers valued AS feedback and agreed feedback would improve antibiotic selection. Disclosures Melissa D. Johnson, PharmD MHS AAHIVP, Biomeme: Licensed Technology|Scynexis, Inc: Grant/Research Support|UpToDate: Author Royalties Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, PharmD, MHS, HealthtrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|UpToDate: Royalties

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Duke University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.