P-2192. Hepatitis C Virus Re-infection in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era within the US Veterans Health Administration

Abstract Background Background and Aims: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) results in a sustained virologic response (SVR) in >90% of individuals (1). Limited prior data describes persons who achieve SVR and later develop recurrent viremia. We identify a cohort with HCV viremia after SVR, detail their risk factors for repeat viremia, and describe the time interval to repeat viremia Characteristics of Veterans with recurrent HCV viremia (n= 1129) Methods We identified individuals in the Veterans Health Administration in care during 2021-2022 who received DAAs between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2022, achieved SVR, and developed repeat viremia. We performed a manual chart review of a randomly selected subset of patients (10%) who were adjudicated into four categories defined as: (1) definite reinfection (HCV genotype change after SVR), (2) presumed reinfection (injection drug use, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis receipt, new HIV or hepatitis B diagnoses, or incarceration between SVR and repeat viremia), (3) false positive result based on clinician assessment, or (4) neither (possible late relapse). Adjudication as confirmed reinfection, probable reinfection, false positive, or neither based on chart review, N = 110 SVR = sustained virologic response; EOT = end of treatment; PrEP = pre-exposure prophylaxis VL = viral load. Results Among the 1,129 individuals in the cohort, median time to viremia after SVR was 23 months (IQR 9 – 42 months). Of the 110 individuals randomly selected for chart review, 25.5% (28/110) were definite reinfections, 25.5% (28/110) presumed reinfections, 11.8% (13/110) false positives, and 37.3% (41/110) did not meet any of the above criteria and were considered possible late relapses. Overall, 56/110 (50.9%) had a genotype change or known risk factor for reinfection, with IDU being the most common risk factor (27/110), followed by incarceration (10/110). Time to repeat viremia Conclusion Our study found the median time to repeat viremia is 1.9 years with 75% of individuals developing repeat viremia within 3.6 years. In detailed chart review of a random subset of individuals with repeat viremia, half had confirmed or probable reinfection, and a clinically significant minority were false positive. After EMR review, over one third had no identified risk factor for repeat viremia. (1) Nguyen V, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(12). Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae631.2346
Primary Topic
Hepatitis C virus research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P-2192. Hepatitis C Virus Re-infection in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era within the US Veterans Health Administration

Alexander Matelski, Emily J. Cartwright, Elliott Lowy, Cara D Varley et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Hepatitis C virus research
article

P-2192. Hepatitis C Virus Re-infection in the Direct-Acting Antiviral Era within the US Veterans Health Administration

Alexander Matelski, Emily J. Cartwright, Elliott Lowy, Cara D Varley, Lauren A. Beste, Marissa Maier, Timothy R. Morgan, Brian Grégoire, David B. Ross
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Background and Aims: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) results in a sustained virologic response (SVR) in >90% of individuals (1). Limited prior data describes persons who achieve SVR and later develop recurrent viremia. We identify a cohort with HCV viremia after SVR, detail their risk factors for repeat viremia, and describe the time interval to repeat viremia Characteristics of Veterans with recurrent HCV viremia (n= 1129) Methods We identified individuals in the Veterans Health Administration in care during 2021-2022 who received DAAs between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2022, achieved SVR, and developed repeat viremia. We performed a manual chart review of a randomly selected subset of patients (10%) who were adjudicated into four categories defined as: (1) definite reinfection (HCV genotype change after SVR), (2) presumed reinfection (injection drug use, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis receipt, new HIV or hepatitis B diagnoses, or incarceration between SVR and repeat viremia), (3) false positive result based on clinician assessment, or (4) neither (possible late relapse). Adjudication as confirmed reinfection, probable reinfection, false positive, or neither based on chart review, N = 110 SVR = sustained virologic response; EOT = end of treatment; PrEP = pre-exposure prophylaxis VL = viral load. Results Among the 1,129 individuals in the cohort, median time to viremia after SVR was 23 months (IQR 9 – 42 months). Of the 110 individuals randomly selected for chart review, 25.5% (28/110) were definite reinfections, 25.5% (28/110) presumed reinfections, 11.8% (13/110) false positives, and 37.3% (41/110) did not meet any of the above criteria and were considered possible late relapses. Overall, 56/110 (50.9%) had a genotype change or known risk factor for reinfection, with IDU being the most common risk factor (27/110), followed by incarceration (10/110). Time to repeat viremia Conclusion Our study found the median time to repeat viremia is 1.9 years with 75% of individuals developing repeat viremia within 3.6 years. In detailed chart review of a random subset of individuals with repeat viremia, half had confirmed or probable reinfection, and a clinically significant minority were false positive. After EMR review, over one third had no identified risk factor for repeat viremia. (1) Nguyen V, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(12). Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Open Forum Infectious DiseasesVol. 12(Supplement_1)
Emory University (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Veterans Health Administration (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), Office of Patient Care Services (US), VA Portland Health Care System (US), Atlanta VA Health Care System (US), VA Long Beach Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Hepatitis C virus research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.