Korean translation and validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory

The most used self-assessment method for assessing driving style is the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). This study aims to adapt the MDSI to Korean drivers (MDSI-K) and confirm the eight-factor driving style structure of the original version. Six hundred forty drivers aged 20-70 agreed to participate in this study. All participants had at least one year of driving experience. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine whether the original MDSI fit the Korean driving style structure, and the goodness-of-fit values were not acceptable. Through correlation analysis, 11 survey questions were removed, and MDSI-K, which has the same structure as the original MDSI, was derived. Subsequent exploratory factor analysis yielded an 8-factor structure with several cross-loadings between factors. For more rigorous validation, Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling was employed, resulting in a refined model comprising 33 items across 8 factors, which incorporated these cross-loadings in the MDSI-K construction. We propose that these cross-loadings represent cultural differences in driving styles. In conclusion, the results of this study show that there is a common concept of driving style that has been previously investigated in various countries. This can be seen as a similarity in the driving culture commonly used across countries. On the other hand, the results of the different structures or survey questions for the same questionnaire by country and culture show differences between cultures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2025-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42344
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Korean translation and validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory

Wonjoon Kim, Ilsun Rhiu
2 citations
Heliyon
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
article

Korean translation and validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory

Wonjoon Kim, Ilsun Rhiu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The most used self-assessment method for assessing driving style is the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (MDSI). This study aims to adapt the MDSI to Korean drivers (MDSI-K) and confirm the eight-factor driving style structure of the original version. Six hundred forty drivers aged 20-70 agreed to participate in this study. All participants had at least one year of driving experience. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to determine whether the original MDSI fit the Korean driving style structure, and the goodness-of-fit values were not acceptable. Through correlation analysis, 11 survey questions were removed, and MDSI-K, which has the same structure as the original MDSI, was derived. Subsequent exploratory factor analysis yielded an 8-factor structure with several cross-loadings between factors. For more rigorous validation, Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling was employed, resulting in a refined model comprising 33 items across 8 factors, which incorporated these cross-loadings in the MDSI-K construction. We propose that these cross-loadings represent cultural differences in driving styles. In conclusion, the results of this study show that there is a common concept of driving style that has been previously investigated in various countries. This can be seen as a similarity in the driving culture commonly used across countries. On the other hand, the results of the different structures or survey questions for the same questionnaire by country and culture show differences between cultures.

HeliyonVol. 11(3)
Dongduk Women's University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Traffic and Road Safety
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.